Metal Alloy Forging Microstructure Refinement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing forging processes for metallic alloy components, such as those for gas turbine engines, face limitations in adjusting the process parameters to meet required properties without the need for post-forming heat treatments, resulting in non-uniform microstructures and properties.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a first forging action followed by a heat treatment step that alters the microstructure without changing the shape, and a second forging action that further refines the shape while maintaining the microstructural changes, using controlled temperature and percent reduction in forging height to achieve a homogeneous microstructure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional multi-step forging process with tightly controlled parameters is used, then required component properties are met, but microstructure uniformity is poor and post-forming heat treatments are needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemicrostructure uniformityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The forging process is divided into three distinct steps: first forging action, heat treatment step, and second forging action. This segmentation allows each step to be optimized independently - the first forging establishes initial shape, the heat treatment refines microstructure uniformly, and the second forging achieves final dimensions, eliminating the need for post-forming heat treatments while improving microstructure uniformity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The heat treatment step is performed as a preliminary action between the two forging actions to pre-refine the microstructure before the final forging operation. This preliminary heat treatment ensures uniform grain structure is established early in the process, preventing microstructure non-uniformity from developing in subsequent forging steps

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If forging parameters are tightly controlled to meet required properties, then component strength is sufficient, but process flexibility is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess flexibilityVSAvoidproperty requirement compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The process introduces dynamic flexibility by allowing parameter adjustments in the second forging action based on microstructure quality from the first forging and heat treatment. The tightly controlled parameters are applied selectively - stringent control during heat treatment for microstructure uniformity, and adjusted control in the second forging for final properties - enabling adaptation to different component requirements while ensuring reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If post-forming heat treatment is used to achieve required properties, then microstructure can be refined, but additional process steps and time are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing cycle timeVSAvoidmicrostructure uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The heat treatment step is merged into the forging process sequence, combining microstructure refinement with the shaping operations. Instead of separate post-forming heat treatment, the heat treatment is integrated between forging actions, eliminating additional process time while achieving the same microstructure refinement benefit

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in a more homogeneous microstructural average grain size, closely meeting property requirements and reducing variations, thereby enhancing the quality of the final component.

Implementation Method 1

The heat treatment step includes subjecting the metallic alloy work piece to a heat treatment temperature that alters the microstructure of the metallic alloy work piece without the application of a forging action that changes the shape of the metallic alloy work piece

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat treatment: Heat Treatment

Implementation Method 2

The treatment step includes altering the microstructural average grain size of the metallic alloy work piece without the application of a forging action that changes the shape of the metallic alloy work piece

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGrain refinement: Heat Treatment

Data Source

PatentUS8790473B2Method for forging metal alloy components for improved and uniform grain refinement and strength
Publication Date: 2014.07.29 RTX CORP
  • US8790473B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of forging includes a first forging action that changes the shape of a metallic alloy work piece. A second forging action further changes the shape of the metallic alloy work piece after the first forging action. A heat treatment step is conducted after the first forging action and prior to the second forging action. The heat treatment step includes subjecting the metallic alloy work piece to a heat treatment temperature that alters the microstructure of the metallic alloy work piece without the application of a forging action that changes the shape of the metallic alloy work piece.