Soft Magnetic Alloy Powder Circularity Control for Low Core Loss

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing soft magnetic alloy powders struggle to produce magnetic cores with improved core loss and DC superimposition characteristics due to limitations in particle size and circularity, leading to reduced performance in magnetic components.

Innovation Solution

A soft magnetic alloy powder with a specific compositional formula ((Fe(1−(α+β))CoαNiβ)(1−γ)X1γ)(1−(a+b+c+d+e))BaPbSicCdCre, where X1 includes elements like Ti, Zr, and rare earth elements, is used, and an elliptical water flow atomizing apparatus is employed to produce particles with enhanced average circularity and reduced variance, resulting in improved magnetic properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If conventional soft magnetic alloy powders are used, then manufacturing is simpler, but core loss increases and DC superimposition characteristics deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecore lossVSAvoidparticle circularity control
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling particle size distribution (D90-based classification) and circularity parameters (average circularity ≥0.75, variance ≤0.035) to reduce core loss while improving DC superimposition characteristics. This resolves the contradiction by establishing specific quantitative parameters that simultaneously achieve energy efficiency and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite material composition with specific alloying elements (Fe, Co, Ni, B, Si, C, Cr, and optional rare earth elements) to achieve both reduced core loss and improved particle characteristics. The composite alloy structure enables simultaneous optimization of magnetic properties and particle morphology, resolving the contradiction between energy loss and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If particle size and circularity are not controlled, then manufacturing is easier, but magnetic component performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic component performanceVSAvoidparticle size and circularity control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes specific parameter ranges for particle size (using D90 as reference) and circularity (average ≥0.75, variance ≤0.035) to ensure both manufacturing feasibility and component reliability. These parameter specifications resolve the contradiction by defining a controlled manufacturing window that achieves high performance without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control through strict specification of particle characteristics (size distribution relative to D90, circularity metrics) that can be measured and controlled during manufacturing. This feedback mechanism ensures consistent magnetic component performance while maintaining manufacturability, resolving the contradiction between reliability and manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If alloy composition is simplified, then manufacturing is easier, but magnetic properties deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic propertiesVSAvoidalloy composition complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a composite alloy system with multiple elements (Fe, Co, Ni, B, Si, C, Cr) in specific proportions to achieve superior magnetic properties. The complex composition is justified by the significant improvement in magnetic performance, resolving the contradiction between property reliability and compositional complexity through synergistic element interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by strategically positioning specific alloying elements (e.g., B and Si for amorphous structure formation, rare earth elements for enhanced magnetic properties) within the alloy system. This targeted element placement optimizes magnetic properties without uniformly increasing complexity throughout the entire material system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240071660A1Soft magnetic alloy powder, magnetic core, magnetic component, and electronic device
Publication Date: 2024.02.29 TDK CORP
  • US20240071660A1 patent drawing
  • US20240071660A1 patent drawing
  • US20240071660A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A soft magnetic alloy powder comprises a component having a compositional formula ((Fe(1−(α+β))CoαNiβ)(1−γ)X1γ)(1−(a+b+c+d+e))BaPbSicCdCre in atomic ratio. X1 comprises at least one selected from specific elements. Values of a, b, c, d, e, α, β, and γ of the compositional formula satisfy specific ranges. The soft magnetic alloy powder comprises soft magnetic alloy particles including soft magnetic alloy particles having a particle size of (0.95×D90) or more and (1.05×D90) or less. An average Wadell's circularity of the soft magnetic alloy particles having the particle size of (0.95×D90) or more and (1.05×D90) or less is 0.75 or more. A variance of Wadell's circularity of the soft magnetic alloy particles having the particle size of (0.95×D90) or more and (1.05×D90) or less is 0.035 or less.