Almen Strip Holder Replica for Shot Peening Shadowing Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing Almen strip holders fail to accurately determine the saturation of complex-shaped workpieces, particularly coiled springs, due to masking/shadowing effects, leading to incorrect peening time estimation and potential impact damage.

Innovation Solution

An improved test strip holder with a mask replica structure that simulates the shadowing effect of workpieces, allowing for accurate determination of saturation on both exposed and obstructed surfaces, and a main body with rounded edges and reduced weight to prevent impact damage and improve mixing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a standard Almen strip holder is used, then the peening process is simple and quick, but the saturation determination is inaccurate for complex-shaped workpieces due to masking/shadowing effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesaturation determination accuracyVSAvoidstrip holder structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the copying principle by creating a mask replica structure that replicates the three-dimensional geometry of the workpiece being peened. This replica is attached to the Almen strip holder, allowing the holder to simulate the exact shadowing and masking effects that the actual workpiece will create during peening. The replica captures the complex shape features (such as coil springs, hollow sections, or obstructed surfaces) without requiring the actual workpiece to be present during testing, thereby enabling accurate saturation determination while maintaining a relatively simple device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the Almen strip holder has sharp edges and high weight, then the holder is structurally strong, but it causes impact damage to workpieces and poor mixing during peening

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkpiece impact damageVSAvoidholder structural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the spheroidality principle by replacing sharp edges and corners of the Almen strip holder with rounded or curved surfaces. This geometric modification eliminates stress concentration points that would otherwise cause impact damage to workpieces during the peening process. The rounded edges also improve the holder's ability to mix uniformly with workpieces in batch peening operations, ensuring consistent exposure to shot particles. The curvature design maintains structural integrity while reducing harmful impact effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Reliability

If additional peening time is applied to ensure saturation of obstructed surfaces, then coverage is improved, but peening time and energy consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeening coverageVSAvoidpeening time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the preliminary action principle by performing saturation testing beforehand using the modified Almen strip holder with the mask replica attached. This preliminary test determines the exact saturation point for the specific workpiece geometry and peening conditions. Once saturation is identified through this preliminary assessment, the optimal peening time can be established in advance, eliminating the need for excessive peening time during actual production. This approach ensures complete coverage of both exposed and obstructed surfaces while minimizing time and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The improved test strip holder provides accurate saturation prediction for complex-shaped workpieces, reduces peening time, and minimizes workpiece damage, optimizing the peening process.

Implementation Method 1

The process involves striking the metal surface with shot (e.g., spherically-shaped metal particles, spherically-shaped metal ceramic particles, etc.) with force sufficient to create plastic deformation in the surface of the workpiece

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShot peening: Shot Peening

Implementation Method 2

struck the metal surface with shot with force sufficient to create plastic deformation in the surface of the workpiece

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Implementation Method 3

the degree of deformation of the Almen strip is measured to determine the amount of compressive stresses in the Almen strip created by the shot peening operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeformation measurement: Deformation

Data Source

PatentUS20260049915A1Apparatus and method for metal treatment analysis
Publication Date: 2026.02.19 ASSOCIATED SPRING US LLC
  • US20260049915A1 patent drawing
  • US20260049915A1 patent drawing
  • US20260049915A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An improved peening process to simulate the shadowing effect of workpieces that are being peened to more accurately determine the degree to which a workpiece has been peened, and to an improved test strip holder that can be used to better simulate the shadowing effect of workpieces that are being peened.