Alpha-Beta Titanium Alloy Composition for High Specific Strength

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current high-strength titanium alloys used in aerospace applications, such as Ti-550, Ti-6246, and Ti-17, exhibit increased weight due to heavy alloying elements like Mo, Sn, and Zr, leading to higher costs and reduced specific strength compared to the baseline Ti-64 alloy, which is a concern for weight-sensitive components like rotating parts.

Innovation Solution

A novel alpha-beta titanium alloy, referred to as Timetal 575 or Ti-575, is developed with a composition of Al 4.7-6.0 wt.%, V 6.5-8.0 wt.%, Si 0.15-0.6 wt.%, Fe up to 0.3 wt.%, O 0.15-0.23 wt.%, and incidental impurities, achieving a higher yield strength and fracture toughness while maintaining ductility, through optimized heat treatment and processing techniques.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If heavy alloying elements (Mo, Sn, Zr) are incorporated to increase strength, then strength is improved, but weight and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the compositional parameters by replacing heavy elements (Mo, Sn, Zr) with lighter elements (Al, V, Si, Fe) in specific concentration ranges. This parameter substitution maintains strength while reducing density, directly resolving the contradiction between strength and weight

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a multi-element composite alloy system (Ti-Al-V-Si-Fe-O) where different elements contribute synergistic effects. Al and V provide strength, Si enhances high-temperature properties, Fe refines microstructure, and O controls phase stability. This composite approach achieves high strength without relying on heavy elements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If heavy alloying elements (Mo, Sn, Zr) are incorporated to increase strength, then strength is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the compositional parameters by substituting expensive heavy elements (Mo, Sn, Zr) with more cost-effective lighter elements (Al, V, Si, Fe). This parameter substitution maintains strength requirements while significantly reducing material cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs more economical alloying elements (Al, V, Si, Fe) that are generally cheaper and more abundant than heavy elements (Mo, Sn, Zr). This substitution with more affordable materials reduces manufacturing cost while achieving the required mechanical properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Weight of moving object

If Ti-64 is used as baseline material, then cost and weight are reduced, but strength is insufficient for high-strength applications

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveweightVSAvoidstrength
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite alloy system (Ti-Al-V-Si-Fe-O) that builds upon the Ti-64 foundation by adding synergistic elements. Al and V provide solid solution strengthening, Si adds precipitation hardening capability, Fe refines grain structure, and O enhances phase stability. This composite approach achieves superior strength to Ti-64 while maintaining similar weight characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Strength

If higher strength alloys are used for rotating components, then strength is improved, but specific strength deteriorates due to weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidspecific strength
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes compositional parameters by using lighter elements (Al density 2.7 g/cm³, V density 6.0 g/cm³) instead of heavy elements (Mo density 10.2 g/cm³, Sn density 7.3 g/cm³, Zr density 6.5 g/cm³). This parameter change increases strength while minimizing density increase, thereby improving specific strength (strength/density ratio) which is critical for rotating components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3521480B1High-strength alpha-beta titanium alloy
Publication Date: 2023.08.02 TITANIUM METALS CORP
  • EP3521480B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP3521480B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP3521480B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

An alpha-beta titanium alloy comprising: Al at a concentration of from 4.7 wt.% to 6.0 wt.%; V at a concentration of from 6.5 wt.% to 8.0 wt.%; Si at a concentration of less than 1.0 wt.% ; O at a concentration of less than 1.0 wt.% ; and Ti and incidental impurities as a balance, wherein an Al/V ratio is from 0.65 to 0.8, the Al/V ratio being equal to the concentration of the Al divided by the concentration of the V in weight percent.