Alpha-Beta Dihydroxy Carbonyl Cracking for Lactic Acid

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The depletion of fossil fuels has led to a need for sustainable technologies to produce high-value petroleum-based chemicals like propylene glycol and other low-carbon-numbered products from renewable resources, with existing methods facing challenges in efficiently utilizing biomass-derived substrates such as gluconic acid and glucaric acid to synthesize intermediates like pyruvic acid and glyceraldehyde.

Innovation Solution

A non-enzymatic synthesis pathway involving dehydration and cracking of α-, β-dihydroxy carbonyl compounds using chemical catalysts, followed by hydrogenation, to produce lower carbon-numbered cracked products like pyruvic acid and glyceraldehyde, which can be further converted to valuable end products like lactic acid and propylene glycol.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If enzyme catalysis is used for the conversion of gluconic acid and glucaric acid to pyruvic acid and glyceraldehyde, then reaction selectivity is improved, but operating costs increase due to enzyme separation and limited reaction conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction selectivityVSAvoidoperating costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive, delicate enzymes with inexpensive, robust chemical catalysts (acid catalysts such as sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, or solid acid catalysts) that can be used without separation steps. These chemical catalysts are 'cheap short-living objects' that can be easily disposed of or regenerated, eliminating the need for costly enzyme separation and purification equipment while maintaining high reaction selectivity through optimized catalytic pathways.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by utilizing acid catalysis under controlled temperature and pH conditions to achieve high selectivity for pyruvic acid and glyceraldehyde formation. By adjusting the acid type, concentration, and reaction temperature, the process optimizes reaction pathways to favor desired products while avoiding side reactions, thereby achieving enzyme-level selectivity with simpler, cheaper catalytic systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If enzyme catalysis is used, then reaction selectivity is improved, but device complexity increases due to enzyme separation requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction selectivityVSAvoidenzyme separation equipment
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates the need for complex enzyme separation equipment by using disposable chemical acid catalysts that remain in solution or can be easily removed through simple neutralization or filtration. This replaces the need for sophisticated ultrafiltration membranes, centrifuges, or chromatography systems required for enzyme recovery, significantly simplifying the overall process equipment while maintaining high product selectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the catalytic function from complex biological enzyme systems and isolates it to simple chemical acid catalysts. This extraction eliminates the need for associated separation equipment, as the chemical catalysts can be easily separated from products through standard acid-base neutralization or filtration, thereby removing the device complexity associated with enzyme recovery systems while preserving reaction selectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of manufacture

If chemical catalysts are used for cracking, then operating costs decrease and device complexity is reduced, but reaction conditions become more restrictive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating costsVSAvoidreaction conditions flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter changes to overcome the restrictiveness of chemical catalysts by systematically optimizing acid type (mineral acids vs. solid acid catalysts), concentration (0.1-10% w/v), temperature (25-100°C), and pH (1-3) to expand the operational window. These parameter adjustments allow the process to achieve high selectivity under mild conditions while maintaining cost-effectiveness, thereby increasing adaptability without sacrificing the economic advantages of chemical catalysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite catalytic systems combining different acid catalysts with specific supports or modifiers to enhance versatility. For example, solid acid catalysts like sulfonated carbon or metal-organic frameworks are used to provide both catalytic activity and ease of separation, while tunable surface properties allow adaptation to different substrates and product requirements, thereby expanding reaction condition flexibility while maintaining the cost advantages of chemical catalysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enhances reaction selectivity and yield, reduces undesired side reactions, and decreases operating costs by avoiding enzyme use, enabling efficient production of high-value intermediates and end products from renewable carbohydrate-based substrates.

Implementation Method 1

dehydrating the starting compound to form a dicarbonyl intermediate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDehydration:

Implementation Method 2

cracking the dicarbonyl intermediate to form a cracked product

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCracking:

Implementation Method 3

hydrogenating the cracked product to produce an end product

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrogenation: Hydrogenation

Data Source

PatentUS20250289777A1Dehydration and cracking of alpha-, beta-dihydroxy carbonyl compounds to lactic acid and other products
Publication Date: 2025.09.18 ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND CO
  • US20250289777A1 patent drawing
  • US20250289777A1 patent drawing
  • US20250289777A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Processes are disclosed for the synthesis of a cracked product or an end product, from a starting compound or substrate having a carbonyl functional group (C═O), with hydroxy-substituted carbon atoms at alpha (α) and beta (β) positions, relative to the carbonyl functional group. According a particular embodiment, an α-, β-dihydroxy carboxylic acid or carboxylate is dehydrated to form a dicarbonyl intermediate by transformation of the α-hydroxy group to a second carbonyl group and removal of the β-hydroxy group. The dicarbonyl intermediate is cracked to form the cracked product, in which the first and second carbonyl groups are preserved. Either or both of (i) the cracked product and (ii) a second cracked product generated from cleavage of a carbon-carbon bond of the dicarbonyl intermediate, may be further converted (e.g., by hydrogenation) to one or more end products, which, like the cracked product(s), also having fewer carbon atoms relative to the dicarbonyl intermediate and substrate.