Alpha-Quasi-Nonblocking Network Configuration Enumeration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for configuring mechanical patch panel networks in optical fiber wiring are inefficient, as they either require excessive equipment (strictly nonblocking) or lead to operational errors and increased costs (rearrangeably nonblocking).

Innovation Solution

The proposed technique uses an algorithm to enumerate α-quasi-nonblocking configurations, which fall between strictly and rearrangeably nonblocking configurations, by introducing a parameter α that ranges from 0 to 1. This approach minimizes the number of mechanical patch panels used while ensuring a low probability of blocking states.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If strictly nonblocking configuration is used, then any connection pattern can be achieved, but the number of mechanical patch panels increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection pattern flexibilityVSAvoidnumber of mechanical patch panels
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a parameter α (0 ≤ α ≤ 1) to define α-quasi-nonblocking configurations, where α=0 corresponds to rearrangeably nonblocking and α=1 corresponds to strictly nonblocking. By adjusting α, the system can find optimal configurations that balance connection flexibility with reduced equipment quantity, avoiding the need for fully strictly nonblocking configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of implementing full strictly nonblocking capability, the patent applies partial nonblocking action through α-quasi-nonblocking configurations. This allows the system to achieve sufficient connection flexibility for expected patterns without the excessive equipment required for complete nonblocking, thereby reducing the number of mechanical patch panels while maintaining adequate adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Quantity of substance

If rearrangeably nonblocking configuration is used, then the number of mechanical patch panels is reduced, but manual wiring operations and operational errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of mechanical patch panelsVSAvoidmanual wiring operations
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

By introducing the parameter α and enumerating α-quasi-nonblocking configurations, the system can select configurations that minimize blocking probability for expected connection patterns. This reduces the need for manual rearrangement operations while maintaining a reasonable number of mechanical patch panels, thereby improving ease of operation compared to purely rearrangeably nonblocking configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary enumeration and selection of optimal α-quasi-nonblocking configurations before actual network operation. This pre-planning ensures that the network is configured to handle expected connection patterns efficiently, minimizing the need for subsequent manual wiring operations and reducing operational errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Quantity of substance

If the number of mechanical patch panels is minimized, then equipment costs are reduced, but the probability of blocking states increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of mechanical patch panelsVSAvoidblocking probability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses the parameter α to control the trade-off between the number of mechanical patch panels and blocking probability. By optimizing α, the system achieves configurations that minimize blocking probability for expected connection patterns while using fewer mechanical patch panels than strictly nonblocking configurations, thereby maintaining reliability with reduced equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-optimization by automatically enumerating and selecting optimal α-quasi-nonblocking configurations based on expected connection patterns. This eliminates the need for manual trial-and-error configuration, ensuring that the network achieves minimal blocking probability with minimal equipment through automated optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12225331B2Network configuration enumeration device, network configuration enumeration method and network configuration enumeration program
Publication Date: 2025.02.11 NIPPON TELEGRAPH & TELEPHONE CORP
  • US12225331B2 patent drawing
  • US12225331B2 patent drawing
  • US12225331B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An object of the present disclosure is to propose a technique to enumerate intermediate configurations at high speeds. A configuration enumeration device 10 according to the present disclosure enumerates a network configuration in an input layer 21, an intermediate layer 22, and an output layer 23 that minimizes the number of mechanical patch panels provided in mechanical patch panels, by using α-quasi-nonblocking configurations, where α being 0 indicates a rearrangeably nonblocking configuration and α being 1 indicates a strictly nonblocking configuration, for 0≤α≤1, when a minimum value C of wiring capacity of mechanical patch panels having the input layer 21, the intermediate layer 22, and the output layer 23 is obtained.