Alpha-Substituted PDI Electron Acceptors for OPV

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current organic photovoltaic (OPV) cells face challenges in increasing power conversion efficiency (PCE) and material costs, particularly due to the high cost, limited light absorption, and instability of fullerene derivatives used as electron acceptors, which hinder industrial application and device performance improvement.

Innovation Solution

Development of α-substituted perylene diimide (PDI) derivatives as small molecular and polymerized electron acceptors, functionalized at the ortho-position to maintain planarity and reduce π-π interaction, enhancing electron transport and photovoltaic performance without introducing torsion in the perylene core.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If fullerene derivatives are used as electron acceptors, then electron accepting properties are improved, but cost increases and stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectron accepting propertiesVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive fullerene derivatives with cheaper PDI-based electron acceptors. The PDI molecules are designed to be cost-effective alternatives while maintaining functional performance, directly addressing the cost issue of fullerene-based systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the molecular structure of PDI by introducing specific substituents at bay positions to tune electron affinity and LUMO energy levels. This structural parameter optimization enables PDI to achieve electron accepting properties comparable to fullerenes without the associated cost and stability problems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If fullerene derivatives are used as electron acceptors, then electron accepting properties are improved, but light absorption range is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectron accepting propertiesVSAvoidlight absorption range
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates composite electron accepting systems by combining PDI core structures with various donor moieties (such as triphenylamine, carbazole) to form D-A type molecules. This composite approach extends the light absorption range into the visible region while preserving electron accepting capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Stability of the object's composition

If PDI is functionalized at bay-positions, then aggregation is reduced, but electron transport is diminished

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaggregation tendencyVSAvoidelectron transport
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces specific substituents at bay positions of PDI to locally modify molecular properties. The substituents are carefully selected to provide steric hindrance that prevents aggregation while maintaining planarity of the perylene core, thus preserving electron transport pathways.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses moderate steric hindrance from bay-position substituents to partially disrupt π-stacking without completely preventing it. This partial action maintains sufficient π-π interaction for electron transport while reducing excessive aggregation that would harm device performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Stability of the object's composition

If PDI is functionalized at N-position, then aggregation is reduced, but planarity is disrupted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaggregation tendencyVSAvoidplanarity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the functionalization sites by choosing bay positions instead of N-positions. This segmentation allows independent optimization: bay-position substituents handle aggregation control while leaving the N-position and core structure planar for electron transport.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The α-substituted PDI derivatives exhibit superior photovoltaic performance with higher power conversion efficiency and electron mobility, maintaining close packing order in blended films, leading to enhanced charge separation and transport, thus overcoming the limitations of fullerene-based acceptors.

Implementation Method 1

Organic photovoltaic (OPV) solar cells have advanced to the current stage that faces two challenges. One challenge is to further increase the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of those cells.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotovoltaic effect: Photovoltaic Effect

Implementation Method 2

Due to the strong tendency of aggregation of the extended conjugated backbone of PDI, two strategies were adopted to reduce the strong π-stacking

Methodology Applied
Scientific Effectπ-π stacking: Van der Waals Force

Implementation Method 3

The α-substituted PDI derivatives exhibit superior photovoltaic performance with higher power conversion efficiency and electron mobility

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectron transport: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS10818849B2Electron acceptors based on alpha-position substituted PDI for OPV solar cells
Publication Date: 2020.10.27 UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
  • US10818849B2 patent drawing
  • US10818849B2 patent drawing
  • US10818849B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to α-substituted perylene diimide (PDI) derivatives as small molecular and polymerized electron acceptors in organic photovoltaic cells.