Alpha Yohimbine Extraction Process Using Methanol Solvent

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for extracting alpha yohimbine from Rauwolfia species are complex, time-consuming, and economically inefficient, often requiring sophisticated equipment and multiple steps with expensive solvents, resulting in low yields.

Innovation Solution

A simplified industrial process using methanol as a solvent and reducing the number of steps and reagents, eliminating the need for complex chromatography and acidification, with acid-base extraction and chloroform washing to achieve higher yields.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If sophisticated techniques such as column chromatography and HPLC are used for extraction and purification, then purification precision is improved, but device complexity and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurification precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and utilizes only the essential components needed for purification (organic solvent, alkali, and acid) while eliminating sophisticated equipment like column chromatography and HPLC. This selective extraction approach achieves adequate purification precision without the complexity and cost of advanced analytical equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces expensive, sophisticated purification equipment with simple, inexpensive chemical reagents and basic laboratory glassware. The process uses readily available organic solvents, alkalis, and acids that can be easily disposed of after use, eliminating the need for costly specialized equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple extraction steps with expensive solvents and reagents are used, then purification precision is improved, but loss of substance increases due to handling losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurification precisionVSAvoidhandling losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies different qualities to different stages of the process: using a polar solvent (methanol) for initial extraction to maximize yield, then using non-polar solvents for purification steps. Each step is optimized for its specific function, reducing overall substance loss while maintaining purification precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the polarity parameter of solvents between extraction and purification steps. Methanol (polar) is used for extraction to dissolve alkaloids effectively, while non-polar solvents are used for purification to separate the product. This parameter change optimizes both yield and purity while minimizing losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple acidification and alkalization steps are used, then purification precision is improved, but loss of time and loss of substance increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurification precisionVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses a single alkalization step followed by a single acidification step rather than multiple repetitive cycles. This partial action approach achieves sufficient purification precision without the excessive time consumption and handling losses associated with multiple repeated steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Manufacturing precision

If expensive solvents such as oxalic acid, tartaric acid, and ethyl acetate are used, then purification precision is improved, but productivity decreases due to higher costs and longer processing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurification precisionVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces expensive, specialized reagents (oxalic acid, tartaric acid, ethyl acetate) with common, inexpensive alternatives (hydrochloric acid and standard organic solvents). This substitution maintains adequate purification precision while dramatically reducing costs and processing time, thereby improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process achieves a 50-65% increase in alpha yohimbine yield, making it more economical and commercially viable by minimizing handling losses and eliminating the use of expensive solvents and equipment.

Implementation Method 1

extraction was carried out using organic solvent methanol

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolvation: Solvation

Implementation Method 2

The extract was then acidified using hydrochloric acid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcid-base extraction: Liquid-Liquid Extraction

Implementation Method 3

extraction using an organic solvent that is Chloroform without the use of any acid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLiquid-liquid extraction: Liquid-Liquid Extraction

Data Source

PatentUS20240058325A1Improved industrial process for extraction of alpha yohimbine from rauwolfia species and the extract thereof
Publication Date: 2024.02.22 PAWAN KUMAR GOEL
  • US20240058325A1 patent drawing
  • US20240058325A1 patent drawing
  • US20240058325A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention discloses an improved process for the extraction of alpha yohimbine from leaves of Rauwolfia species, preferably Rauwolfia canescens/Rauwolfia tetraphylla. Process involves use of non-polar alcoholic solvent e.g. methanol for precipitating the compound of interest, repetitive washing with halogenated solvents and washing with hexane or petroleum ether to obtain high yields of high purity extract. Use of organic acids such as tartaric acid, acetic acid and organic solvent ethyl acetate etc. is eliminated making the process less time consuming and economical. The yield of the final product is 50-60% higher i.e. 600-670 mg/100 g dry leaves, than prior art process. Further, the extract obtained by the process of present invention contains yohimbine hydrochloride as a marker compound in analytically detectable amounts of more than 0.1% of the extract.