Alternating Fin Casing for Electric Motor Heat Dissipation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electric motor casings with cooling fins face a trade-off between increased heat dissipation efficiency and air flow resistance, leading to limited cooling performance and increased noise, as well as larger dimensions due to fin height and number.

Innovation Solution

A casing design featuring alternating main and secondary fins, where secondary fins are shorter than main fins, reducing air flow resistance while maintaining heat exchange efficiency, allowing for reduced operating temperature and smaller dimensions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If the number of cooling fins is increased, then the heat dissipation efficiency is improved, but the air flow cross-section is reduced and resistance to flow increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat dissipation efficiencyVSAvoidresistance to air flow
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The cooling fins are segmented into two distinct types: first fins with greater height and second fins with lesser height. This segmentation allows the system to optimize heat dissipation surface area while maintaining adequate air flow cross-section, resolving the contradiction between heat dissipation efficiency and air flow resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the casing have different fin configurations. The first fins are positioned to maximize heat dissipation in areas requiring greater cooling, while the second fins are positioned to maintain air flow in areas where flow resistance would otherwise be excessive. This local differentiation optimizes both heat dissipation and air flow simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Temperature

If the height of cooling fins is increased, then the heat dissipation efficiency is improved, but the overall dimensions of the casing increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat dissipation efficiencyVSAvoidoverall dimensions of casing
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The fin height is segmented into two levels: first fins with greater height for maximum heat dissipation and second fins with lesser height for compactness. This segmentation achieves effective heat dissipation without requiring uniformly high fins across the entire casing, thus reducing the overall dimensions while maintaining thermal performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Temperature

If the height of cooling fins is increased, then the heat dissipation efficiency is improved, but the resistance to heat transmission increases along the fin height

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat dissipation efficiencyVSAvoidresistance to heat transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The fin system is segmented into first fins with greater height and second fins with lesser height. The shorter second fins reduce the path length for heat transmission, thereby reducing thermal resistance along the fin height, while the taller first fins provide sufficient heat dissipation surface area to maintain overall heat dissipation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Temperature

If the number of cooling fins is increased, then the heat dissipation efficiency is improved, but the noise increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat dissipation efficiencyVSAvoidnoise
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The fin configuration is segmented into two height levels, which optimizes the balance between heat dissipation surface area and air flow smoothness. This segmentation reduces turbulence and vortex formation compared to a uniform high-fin configuration, thereby reducing noise while maintaining heat dissipation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enhances heat dissipation efficiency, enabling lower operating temperatures and reduced thermal stress, allowing the motor to operate in more demanding conditions with reduced noise and smaller dimensions.

Implementation Method 1

the external surface of the casing is provided with a plurality of cooling fins that considerably increase the surface of the casing and consequently favour the increase of the heat flow transferred to the air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

The air flow produced in this way cools the casing and therefore makes it possible to remove the heat generated by the electric motor during its operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectConvection cooling: Convection

Data Source

PatentEP2738919B1Casing for an electric motor and electric motor comprising said casing
Publication Date: 2015.02.18 CALPEDA
  • EP2738919B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2738919B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2738919B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The invention is a casing (2) for an electric motor (1), comprising: a tubular body (5) that defines a longitudinal axis (X); a plurality of cooling fins (6, 7) projecting from the tubular body (5) by corresponding heights, wherein each fin mainly develops according to the direction corresponding to the longitudinal axis (X) and said fins mutually face each other and are arranged in sequence one after the other according to a direction (Y) that is perpendicular to the longitudinal axis (X). The fins (6, 7) comprise main fins (6) alternating along the sequence with secondary fins (7), each secondary fin (7) being shorter than the two mutually adjacent main fins (6) between which the secondary fin (7) is interposed.