Alternating Lateral Flow Tubes for Polymer Devolatilization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current devolatilization processes in polymerization reactors are limited by inefficient surface area utilization in devolatilizer nozzles, leading to suboptimal removal of volatiles and polymer throughput.

Innovation Solution

A vessel header design featuring a plurality of lateral flow tubes arranged in a parallel configuration with alternating header penetrations, minimizing spacing between tubes and increasing usable surface area for improved fluid distribution and devolatilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional devolatilizer nozzle design is used, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity and volatile removal efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolymerization reaction throughputVSAvoidheader structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The header is divided into multiple lateral flow tubes arranged in parallel, each tube receiving polymer through separate header penetrations. This segmentation increases the total surface area for polymer distribution and volatile removal, directly improving productivity while the modular parallel structure manages the complexity through systematic repetition of standardized components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design transitions from a single central flow path to a multi-dimensional array of lateral flow tubes extending in parallel. By utilizing alternating header penetrations and distributing flow tubes across multiple spatial dimensions, the system maximizes surface area utilization and throughput capacity without proportionally increasing overall header volume

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Area of stationary object

If lateral flow tubes are arranged in parallel with alternating header penetrations, then surface area for devolatilization increases, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveusable surface area in headerVSAvoidheader assembly difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The header assembly is segmented into standardized lateral flow tube modules that can be manufactured independently and then assembled into the final configuration. Each flow tube is a discrete component with consistent dimensions and penetration patterns, allowing for standardized manufacturing processes and simplified quality control despite the complex overall geometry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design utilizes consistent geometric parameters and repeating patterns across all lateral flow tubes, including uniform spacing, standardized penetration locations, and identical tube dimensions. This parameter standardization simplifies manufacturing by reducing the variety of unique components needed while still achieving the required increased surface area

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If flow tube spacing is minimized, then productivity increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethroughput capacityVSAvoidflow tube arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flow tubes are arranged in a parallel configuration utilizing alternating header penetrations, effectively distributing tubes across multiple spatial dimensions rather than simply increasing density in a single plane. This dimensional distribution maximizes throughput capacity by optimizing space utilization while maintaining manageable inter-tube spacing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances polymerization reaction throughput by 10% and volatile removal by 5-10%, compared to conventional designs, while allowing for easier maintenance and repair.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of lateral flow tubes arranged in a parallel configuration and entering the vessel header through alternating header penetrations with a single header penetration per lateral flow tube

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid distribution through perforated tubes:

Implementation Method 2

volatiles may be removed by vacuum distillation, flash devolatilization, stripping

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum distillation: Vacuum Distillation

Implementation Method 3

volatiles may be removed by vacuum distillation, flash devolatilization, stripping

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlash devolatilization: Flash Evaporation

Implementation Method 4

As the strands fall in the devolatilization vessel, the unreacted monomer and solvent is released while the polymer strands collect at the bottom of the vessel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitational settling: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS8241459B2Polymer melt distributor header design
Publication Date: 2012.08.14 FINA TECH INC
  • US8241459B2 patent drawing
  • US8241459B2 patent drawing
  • US8241459B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vessel header comprising a plurality of lateral flow tubes arranged in a parallel configuration and entering the vessel header through alternating header penetrations with a single header penetration per lateral flow tube. A method of increasing the throughput of a polymerization reaction comprising conducting the polymerization reaction in a reaction vessel comprising a plurality of lateral flow tubes arranged in a parallel configuration and entering the vessel header through alternating header penetrations with a single header penetration per lateral flow tube wherein the polymerization reaction displays an increase in throughput of 10% and a decrease in volatiles of from 5% to 10% when compared to a polymerization reaction carried out in a reaction vessel lacking a plurality of lateral flow tubes arranged in a parallel configuration and entering the vessel header through alternating header penetrations with a single header penetration per lateral flow tube.