Alternating Rolling Mill Stations for Same-Side Cage Extraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Multi-cage rolling mills face challenges in extracting all cages from the same side while maintaining a simplified roll control system that does not require special angular gearboxes, leading to complex and costly control systems and corrosion issues due to water infiltration.

Innovation Solution

A rolling mill design with alternating stations allowing lateral extraction of all cages from the same side, featuring a simplified control system with dedicated gear motor groups and single extensions for each roll, avoiding the need for special angular gearboxes and minimizing water infiltration risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a multi-cage rolling mill is configured to allow lateral extraction of all cages from the same side, then the logistics of managing cages is simplified, but the control system becomes complex and expensive requiring special angular gearboxes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecage extraction logisticsVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by positioning all cages and their extraction mechanisms on one side of the rolling mill structure, creating an asymmetric layout that simplifies cage extraction logistics. This asymmetric configuration eliminates the need for complex angular gearboxes that would be required in symmetric designs, thereby resolving the technical contradiction between ease of operation and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the rolling mill into independent cage units, each with its own motor and gear distributor group, allowing individual cages to be extracted and replaced without affecting others. This segmentation enables simplified logistics while maintaining a manageable control system structure, resolving the contradiction between operational ease and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If angular gearboxes are used in the control system to enable same-side cage extraction, then cage management is simplified, but water infiltration causes corrosion and maintenance issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecage extraction logisticsVSAvoidsystem reliability against corrosion
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the vulnerable angular gearboxes from the system by using alternative mechanical arrangements that do not require these special components. By eliminating angular gearboxes, the design removes the primary entry points for water infiltration, thereby improving system reliability and preventing corrosion while maintaining simplified cage extraction logistics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of water infiltration into a design advantage by positioning motors and drive mechanisms in locations that are naturally protected from water exposure. The simplified control system architecture allows components to be placed in drier areas, turning the constraint of water vulnerability into a benefit for system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Ease of manufacture

If a simplified control system with dedicated gear motor groups is used for each roll, then manufacturing costs are reduced, but achieving same-side extraction becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidcage extraction capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the functions of the motor and gear distributor group into an integrated unit for each cage, eliminating the need for complex angular gearboxes and specialized components. This merging simplifies the control system for easier and cheaper manufacturing while simultaneously enabling same-side cage extraction through the unified design, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing ease and operational capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates universal cage units with standardized motors and gear distributor groups that can be used across all positions in the rolling mill. This universality simplifies manufacturing by using identical components throughout the system while maintaining the capability for same-side extraction, as each standardized unit is designed to work within the asymmetric same-side extraction architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient and cost-effective extraction of all cages from the same side with a simplified control system, reducing maintenance costs and preventing corrosion, while maintaining operational efficiency and ease of maintenance.

Implementation Method 1

Each rolling station comprises three gear motor groups connected to the rolls by single extensions so as to provide the rolls with rotation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGear mechanism: Gear

Implementation Method 2

Each rolling station comprises three actuators mounted on the load-bearing structure and suitable for acting, each on a respective roll, along three radial axes passing through the rolling axis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic actuation: Hydraulic Press

Data Source

PatentUS11565291B2Rolling mill for solid elongated products
Publication Date: 2023.01.31 SMS GRP SPA
  • US11565291B2 patent drawing
  • US11565291B2 patent drawing
  • US11565291B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rolling mill for solid elongated products, defining a rolling axis, including first and second rolling stations. Each station includes a load-bearing structure, a removable roll-holder cartridge with three rolling rolls movable radially and rotating around three equally spaced axes of rotation, and a roll having a vertical rotational axis. Three actuators mount on the load-bearing structure; three gear motor groups connect to the rolls by single extensions. The position of the second station rolls is rotated 60° from the first stations. The rolls with a vertical axis of the first and second stations are arranged on opposite sides of the rolling axis. All rolling stations allow lateral extraction of roll-holder cartridges from the same side of the rolling mill. The stations on the cartridge extraction side have actuators movable relative to the load-bearing structure. The stations with vertical rolls arranged on the opposite side have fixed actuators.