Alternating Tap-Cell Strategy for Area Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Tap cells in integrated circuits do not scale aggressively with technology nodes when using 248 nm litho tools, leading to area consumption and increased costs due to inefficient use of space and the need for more expensive 193 nm litho tools for critical mask layers.

Innovation Solution

The arrangement of tap cells with consecutive first and second tap actives extending to well boundaries within tap columns, optimizing area usage and reducing substrate resistance, allowing for area savings and cost reduction by using cheaper lithography tools.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If tap cells are pre-placed at a fixed pitch using 248 nm litho tools, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but area efficiency deteriorates and scaling becomes aggressive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidarea efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The tap cell is segmented into multiple tap actives (first tap active and second tap active) that can be independently optimized. This segmentation allows different tap actives to serve different functions: some extend to well boundaries for latch-up protection while others are optimized for area efficiency, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing simplicity and area efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the tap cell are assigned different qualities/functions. The first tap active extends to the first well boundary while the second tap active extends to the second well boundary, creating local optimizations that collectively improve both area efficiency and latch-up protection without requiring expensive litho tools

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Quantity of substance

If tap cells consume more area, then fewer transistors per die, but area overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of transistors per dieVSAvoidarea overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The tap actives are arranged in a dimensional optimization where they extend to well boundaries in a manner that optimizes space utilization. By strategically positioning tap actives to reach well boundaries, the design achieves efficient space usage that increases transistor density without proportionally increasing tap cell area overhead

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Manufacturing precision

If 193 nm litho tools are used for tap cells, then manufacturing precision improves, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepattern precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The tap cell design uses a standardized template that can be repeatedly copied across the chip. This copying approach allows the use of less precise but cheaper 248 nm litho tools while maintaining adequate pattern quality, as the standardized design compensates for the lower lithography precision through its inherent robustness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS9419014B2Alternating tap-cell strategy in a standard cell logic block for area reduction
Publication Date: 2016.08.16 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC
  • US9419014B2 patent drawing
  • US9419014B2 patent drawing
  • US9419014B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An integrated circuit includes a plurality of N wells disposed on a P substrate. A plurality of tap columns is located across the plurality of N wells and a plurality of standard cells is located between the tap columns. A plurality of tap cells is disposed consecutively in the plurality of tap columns. Each tap cell further includes a first tap active and a second tap active. The first tap active of a first tap cell extends to the first tap active of a second tap cell which further extends to a well boundary of either the first tap cell or the second tap cell. The first tap active of the first tap cell and the first tap active of the second tap cell are adjacent to each other in the tap column.