Alternating Pattern Wheel Assembly for Terrain Adaptability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wheel designs are inadequate for effective use on a variety of surfaces, as they either lack sufficient structural strength, traction, or adaptability to different terrains, particularly struggling with hard and soft surfaces.

Innovation Solution

A wheel assembly with a body formed in an alternating pattern circumscribed about a central hub, featuring a constant radial distance from the axis of rotation, providing a broad effective width for reduced friction on hard surfaces and increased traction on soft surfaces through a unique arc-based design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a traditional wheel design is used, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the wheel lacks adaptability to different terrains and surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different terrainsVSAvoidwheel structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The wheel body is segmented into multiple alternating high and low portions arranged in a circumferential pattern. This segmentation allows different portions of the wheel to interact with the ground differently, providing adaptability to various terrains while maintaining a relatively simple overall wheel structure that rotates as a single unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the wheel body are given different heights (local qualities) to optimize performance for specific terrain conditions. The high portions provide traction on soft surfaces while the low portions maintain contact on hard surfaces, allowing the wheel to adapt locally to varying ground conditions without requiring completely different wheel designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If a wheel with larger contact area is used, then traction on soft surfaces is improved, but friction on hard surfaces increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraction on soft surfacesVSAvoidfriction on hard surfaces
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The wheel employs periodic action through its alternating high and low portions that contact the ground in a repeating circumferential sequence. As the wheel rotates, different portions periodically engage with the ground, allowing the contact area to vary dynamically during rotation. This periodic variation enables the wheel to achieve both large effective contact area for traction and controlled friction through the alternating pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP2920005B1Wheel assembly and vehicle incorporating same
Publication Date: 2019.07.17 SHARK WHEEL
  • EP2920005B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2920005B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2920005B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A wheel assembly is provided that includes a body coupled to the central hub to rotate about the axis of rotation. The body forms an alternating pattern circumscribed about the central hub at constant radial distance from the axis of rotation. The body defines a median circle centered on and transverse to the axis of rotation. The alternating pattern of the body is evenly distributed across the median circle, resulting in an effective width greater than the width of the body. On hard surfaces, the wheel assembly provides a broad track while maintaining a relatively thin contact result providing reduced friction than a traditional wheel. On soft surfaces, the wheel assembly provides substantial traction.