Non-Invasive Alveolar Detection for Respiratory Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for setting positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in mechanical ventilation are invasive, rely on indirect oxygenation indicators, and fail to non-invasively detect alveolar recruitment and derecruitment, leading to potential lung damage from cyclic opening and closing of alveoli.

Innovation Solution

A non-invasive system that measures end-expiratory reactance (Xee) to determine optimal PEEP, preventing alveolar collapse and overdistension by identifying individual patient-specific endpoints, and uses end-inspiratory reactance (Xei) to adjust pressure waveforms and tidal volumes, optimizing ventilator parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If mechanical ventilation with PEEP is applied to prevent alveolar collapse, then oxygenation is improved, but lung damage from overdistension and cyclic stress may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveoxygenationVSAvoidlung damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously measures end-expiratory reactance (Xee) and provides feedback to automatically adjust PEEP levels. This closed-loop feedback mechanism allows the ventilator to respond to real-time lung recruitment status, preventing both alveolar collapse and overdistension by dynamically optimizing PEEP based on measured reactance values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables the respiratory system to self-regulate by using the patient's own lung mechanics (reactance) to determine optimal PEEP settings. The automated algorithm processes Xee measurements and independently adjusts ventilator parameters without requiring continuous manual intervention, allowing the system to serve itself in optimizing ventilation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Stability of the object's composition

If PEEP is increased to maintain lung recruitment, then alveolar collapse is prevented, but overdistension of lung tissue occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelung recruitmentVSAvoidoverdistension
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces traditional mechanical/empirical PEEP setting methods with a physiological measurement-based approach. By substituting direct mechanical pressure adjustment with reactance measurement and automated algorithmic control, the system precisely identifies the optimal PEEP point where lung recruitment is maximized without overdistension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter used for PEEP determination from empirical oxygenation metrics to end-expiratory reactance (Xee). This parameter change enables more sensitive and specific detection of lung recruitment status, allowing precise optimization of PEEP to prevent both collapse and overdistension.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If invasive monitoring is used to directly measure alveolar recruitment, then detection precision is improved, but patient comfort and ease of operation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealveolar recruitment detectionVSAvoidpatient comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses end-expiratory reactance (Xee) as an intermediary parameter to indirectly measure alveolar recruitment status. Rather than directly measuring alveolar mechanics with invasive sensors, the system employs Xee—a non-invasive electrical impedance parameter—as a mediator that correlates with lung recruitment, providing both precision and patient comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Device complexity

If standardized PEEP values are applied to all patients, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to individual patient needs worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePEEP setting protocolVSAvoidpersonalized ventilation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables each patient to self-determine their optimal PEEP settings through automated measurement of their individual lung mechanics. The algorithm processes each patient's unique Xee measurements and independently calculates personalized PEEP values, eliminating the need for complex manual customization while achieving full adaptability to individual needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from fixed standardized PEEP values to dynamically calculated patient-specific PEEP settings based on individual reactance measurements. This parameter change from static to adaptive PEEP determination achieves personalized ventilation without significantly increasing device complexity, as the automation handles the customization internally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8973578B2Apparatus for respiratory support and non-invasive detection of alveolar derecruitment for patients suffering from respiratory failure
Publication Date: 2015.03.10 POLITECNICO DI MILANO
  • US8973578B2 patent drawing
  • US8973578B2 patent drawing
  • US8973578B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus for respiratory support and non-invasive detection of alveolar recruitment/derecruitment provides air supply to a patient at a base pressure and an additional pressure which can be varied at a frequency of from 5 to 10 Hz and transducers applied to the conduits supplying air to the patient to send electric signals to a computer to obtain a variable positive end-expiratory pressure and a to obtain an end expiratory resistance at varying values of positive end expiratory pressure and defining the state of pulmonary recruitment as the value of the positive end-expiratory pressure which corresponds to a point of maximum expiratory resistance.