Build Unit Airflow Reorientation for AM Microstructure Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing additive manufacturing (AM) techniques face limitations in controlling airflow orientation with respect to solidification lines, which restricts the angular variation of solidification lines and increases build time due to fixed gas flow directions, leading to potential material defects and reduced microstructure control.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a positioning mechanism for the build unit that allows independent movement in multiple dimensions, enabling a gas flow device to adjust its direction relative to the build unit, allowing for the formation of solidification lines at angles other than 0° and 180°, and re-orientation during the build process to maintain optimal gas flow alignment with solidification lines.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a fixed gas flow direction is used in additive manufacturing, then the device complexity is reduced, but the manufacturing precision of microstructure control deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas flow control systemVSAvoidmicrostructure control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The gas flow device is made dynamically adjustable in orientation relative to the build unit. The system transitions from a fixed gas flow direction to a dynamically reconfigurable one, where the gas flow orientation can be changed during the build process to match different solidification line angles, thereby improving microstructure control without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The orientation parameter of the gas flow device is made variable. By changing the angular parameter of gas flow relative to the build unit, the system adapts to different solidification line orientations, enabling precise microstructure control while maintaining reasonable device complexity through parameter adjustment rather than structural over-engineering

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If the gas flow device direction is adjusted relative to the build unit, then the manufacturing precision of solidification line orientation is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesolidification line orientationVSAvoidpositioning mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The positioning mechanism serves multiple functions: it positions the build unit in space and simultaneously orients the gas flow device relative to the build unit. By making the build unit rotatable or the gas flow device adjustable, a single mechanism achieves both positioning and orientation control, reducing overall device complexity while improving solidification line orientation precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds rotational freedom or angular adjustment capability to the positioning system. By introducing an additional degree of freedom (rotation or angular adjustment), the mechanism can control solidification line orientation in multiple angles, improving manufacturing precision without requiring entirely separate control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If the build unit is re-oriented during the build process, then the reliability of defect reduction is improved, but the productivity decreases due to increased build time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial defect reductionVSAvoidbuild time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The build process incorporates periodic re-orientation of the build unit or gas flow device at strategically determined intervals. Rather than continuous adjustment, the system uses discrete, periodic re-orientation events that align gas flow with solidification lines at critical stages, maintaining defect reduction reliability while minimizing interruptions to build time and preserving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Device complexity

If the angular variation of solidification lines is restricted, then the device complexity is reduced, but the manufacturing precision of microstructure control deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescanning strategy controlVSAvoidmicrostructure control
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The scanning strategy is made dynamic rather than static. The system can vary the angle of solidification lines during the build process by adjusting the orientation of the build unit or gas flow device, enabling diverse microstructure control without requiring excessively complex scanning control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The angular parameter of solidification lines is made variable through software control of the positioning or gas flow orientation system. By changing the angular parameter dynamically, the system achieves diverse microstructure control while keeping the physical device complexity manageable through software-driven parameter variation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the ability to control microstructure and reduce material defects by allowing for varied gas flow orientations, thereby improving the quality and efficiency of the additive manufacturing process.

Implementation Method 1

a laser beam to sinter or melt a powder

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser heating: Laser

Implementation Method 2

melting entails fully melting particles of a powder to form a solid homogeneous mass

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 3

sintering entails fusing (agglomerating) particles of a powder at a temperature below the melting point of the powder material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSintering: Sintering

Implementation Method 4

a gas flow device for providing a flow zone along a first direction with relation to the build unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas flow: Convection

Data Source

PatentUS11117320B2Airflow control for additive manufacturing
Publication Date: 2021.09.14 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US11117320B2 patent drawing
  • US11117320B2 patent drawing
  • US11117320B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, apparatus, and program for additive manufacturing. The additive manufacturing device includes a positioning mechanism configured to provide independent movement of at least one build unit in at least two dimensions. The build unit may further include a gasflow device for providing a flow zone along a first direction with relation to the build unit. The build unit may further include a powder delivery mechanism and an irradiation beam directing unit. The irradiation bean unit may follow a first irradiation path, wherein the first irradiation path forms at least a first solidification line and at least a second solidification line formed at an angle other than 0° and 180° with respect to the first solidification line. During the formation of the first solidification line, the build unit may be positioned in a first orientation such that the first direction of the flow zone is substantially perpendicular to the first solidification line. During the formation of the second solidification line, the build unit may be positioned in a second orientation such that the flow zone along the first direction is substantially perpendicular to the second solidification line.