Gas Turbine Blade Assembly With AM Airfoil and Cast Root

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gas turbine engine components, such as turbine blades, are typically cast as single-piece structures, limiting the ability to optimize material properties for strength and cooling efficiency separately, as the airfoil section and root are integrally formed, which can compromise performance and compactness.

Innovation Solution

A method involving separate formation of the pressure and suction side walls using additive manufacturing and the root, platform, and radial supports through casting or forging, allowing for distinct material choices and microchannel cooling, enhancing assembly and joining interfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the airfoil section and root are integrally formed as a single-piece structure, then the component has structural simplicity and ease of manufacture, but the ability to optimize material properties for strength and cooling efficiency separately is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidability to optimize material properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The turbine blade is divided into separate airfoil section and root components that are manufactured independently and then joined together. This segmentation allows each part to be optimized separately - the airfoil section can use materials and structures optimized for aerodynamic performance and cooling, while the root can be optimized for structural strength and attachment to the disc.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If separate formation of pressure and suction side walls is used, then material properties can be optimized separately for strength and cooling efficiency, but the component complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization of material propertiesVSAvoidcomponent complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure side wall and suction side wall are joined together to form the complete airfoil section, combining the separately manufactured walls into a unified structural component. This merging maintains the benefits of separate optimization while creating an integrated airfoil structure that functions as a complete unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional single-piece casting is used, then the manufacturing process is simple, but cooling efficiency and compactness are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process simplicityVSAvoidcooling efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Different material properties and structural characteristics are applied to different parts of the turbine blade. The airfoil section incorporates microchannel cooling structures and materials optimized for thermal management, while the root uses materials and structures optimized for mechanical strength. This local quality approach allows each region to have the specific properties needed for its function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP3058177B1Method of forming a component of a gas turbine engine
Publication Date: 2023.11.29 RTX CORP
  • EP3058177B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3058177B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3058177B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

One exemplary embodiment of this disclosure relates to a gas turbine engine, including a component having a first portion formed using one of a casting and a forging process, and a second portion formed using an additive manufacturing process.