AM Part Topology Correction Using Under- and Over-Deposition Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies face challenges in characterizing and correcting topological deviations between as-designed and as-manufactured parts, which can affect the structural integrity and performance of complex geometric and topological structures, such as lattices and foams, due to limitations in machine and process parameters.

Innovation Solution

The method involves computing set differences between as-designed and as-manufactured models to identify under-deposition (UD) and over-deposition (OD) features, using topological data analysis to quantify topological persistence and deviations, and adjusting manufacturing parameters to reduce these discrepancies, thereby improving the structural integrity of AM parts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If additive manufacturing is used to create complex geometric and topological structures, then manufacturing capability and design flexibility are improved, but topological deviations between as-designed and as-manufactured parts occur due to machine and process parameter limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign flexibilityVSAvoidtopological accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary topological analysis on the as-designed model before manufacturing to identify features that are sensitive to manufacturing deviations. By computing set differences and analyzing topological persistence in advance, the system prepares correction strategies that compensate for expected manufacturing limitations, thereby maintaining topological accuracy despite machine parameter constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a feedback loop where topological deviations between as-designed and as-manufactured models are quantified using persistent homology. This feedback information is then used to iteratively adjust manufacturing parameters or design features, enabling continuous improvement of topological accuracy while maintaining the ability to manufacture complex structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If topological data analysis is used to quantify deviations, then measurement precision is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetopological deviation quantificationVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the topological analysis into distinct computational stages: computing set differences between models, identifying UD and OD features, calculating persistent homology invariants, and quantifying deviations. This segmentation allows each computational task to be optimized independently and enables parallel processing, reducing overall computational complexity while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces persistent homology invariants as intermediary mathematical constructs that bridge the gap between complex geometric models and simplified deviation metrics. These invariants serve as computationally efficient representatives of topological features, enabling accurate deviation quantification without requiring full geometric processing of complex models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If manufacturing parameters are adjusted to reduce topological differences, then manufacturing precision is improved, but process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetopological conformityVSAvoidprocess parameter complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality correction by identifying specific under-deposited and over-deposited features through set difference analysis. Instead of uniformly adjusting all manufacturing parameters, the system targets only the local regions and features that exhibit topological deviations, applying corrected parameters selectively. This approach improves topological conformity while minimizing the overall complexity of process parameter management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11353847B2Modifying additively manufactured part designs using topological analyses
Publication Date: 2022.06.07 GENESEE VALLEY INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US11353847B2 patent drawing
  • US11353847B2 patent drawing
  • US11353847B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Set differences between an as-designed and an as-manufactured model are computed. Discrepancies between the as-designed model and the as-manufactured model are determined based under-deposition and over-deposition features of the set differences. Based on the discrepancies, an input to a manufacturing instrument is changed to reduce topological differences between the as-manufactured model and the as-designed model.