3D Shape Deviation Compensation in Additive Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Additive Manufacturing (AM) techniques face challenges in predicting and compensating for shape deviations in 3D printed products due to various inaccuracies such as substrate geometry defects, process variable disturbances, and material phase change shrinkage, leading to geometric discrepancies between the intended and actual products.

Innovation Solution

A method that involves obtaining a deformation model for an AM machine in a Spherical Coordinate System, predicting deformation errors using in-plane and out-of-plane deformation error models, and applying compensation algorithms to minimize volume and area deviations, thereby enhancing the accuracy of 3D printed products.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If deformation prediction models are applied to 3D models, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshape accuracyVSAvoidmodeling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The deformation model is segmented into two independent components: in-plane deformation error model (defined in first PCS using first angular location variable) and out-of-plane deformation error model (defined in second PCS using second angular location variable). This segmentation allows each component to be developed, calibrated, and applied separately, reducing overall model complexity while maintaining comprehensive deformation prediction capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from traditional 2D or separate 3D deformation models to a unified 3D spherical coordinate system that simultaneously handles both in-plane and out-of-plane deformations. By using angular location variables (θ, φ) in SCS, the model captures three-dimensional deformation behavior in a coordinated framework, improving manufacturing precision without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Manufacturing precision

If compensation algorithms are applied to minimize volume and area deviations, then manufacturing precision is improved, but calculation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric accuracyVSAvoidcompensation calculation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The deformation model is established and calibrated in advance using trial builds and measurements. The in-plane and out-of-plane error models are developed beforehand, storing deformation characteristics for rapid application during compensation. This preliminary action eliminates the need for real-time complex calculations, reducing loss of time while maintaining high geometric accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the compensation problem from minimizing complex multi-objective functions to optimizing a single parameter: volume deviation in SCS. By changing the optimization criterion to focus on volume deviation minimization, the calculation becomes more efficient while still achieving comprehensive geometric accuracy improvement across all dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If deformation models in spherical coordinate system are used, then manufacturing precision is improved, but ease of manufacture worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improve3D shape accuracyVSAvoidmodel implementation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The spherical coordinate system deformation model serves multiple functions simultaneously: it predicts in-plane deformations, predicts out-of-plane deformations, and provides a unified framework for both prediction and compensation operations. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate models for different deformation types, improving ease of manufacture despite the advanced mathematics involved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces the spherical coordinate system as an intermediary mathematical framework that bridges the gap between complex 3D deformation physics and practical compensation implementation. The SCS with angular location variables acts as a mediator that simplifies the transformation and application of deformation corrections, making the overall process more manageable despite the sophistication of the underlying model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10474134B2Systems and methods for compensating for 3D shape deviations in additive manufacturing
Publication Date: 2019.11.12 UNIV OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • US10474134B2 patent drawing
  • US10474134B2 patent drawing
  • US10474134B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for predicting deformation error and compensating for shape deviation in Additive Manufacturing (AM) techniques include, in one aspect, a method including: obtaining a deformation model for an AM machine; predicting deformation for the object using the deformation model applied to the 3D model; selecting an amount of deformation compensation to effect by minimizing deviation for the predicted deformation; and providing the selected amount of deformation compensation to modify the 3D model to compensate for deformation during creation by the AM machine.