Additive Manufacturing Simulation for Material Property Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current additive manufacturing technologies face challenges in designing three-dimensional objects that meet quality and productivity parameters efficiently, as the design processes are complex and time-consuming.

Innovation Solution

The method involves simulating the additive manufacturing process by generating approximate consolidation domains corresponding to consolidation tracks, allowing for predictive inferences about material properties, and using these simulations to create CAD and build files for improved object design and manufacturing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If complex design processes are used to ensure quality parameters, then manufacturing precision is improved, but design time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality parametersVSAvoiddesign time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing simulations and determining predictive inferences about material properties before the actual additive manufacturing process. This allows design optimizations to be made in advance, reducing iterative design cycles and overall design time while maintaining quality parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses digital representations and simulations as copies of the physical manufacturing process. By creating and analyzing virtual models with approximate consolidation domains, designers can predict material properties and optimize designs without repeatedly producing physical prototypes, thus reducing design time while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If detailed simulations are performed to predict material properties, then manufacturing precision is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial property predictionVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the additive manufacturing process into discrete consolidation domains corresponding to individual consolidation tracks. This segmentation allows for localized analysis and prediction of material properties without requiring complex full-process simulations, reducing computational complexity while maintaining prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses approximate consolidation domains as simplified computational models rather than complex detailed simulations. These approximate models provide sufficient predictive capability for material properties with significantly reduced computational requirements, effectively using simpler 'disposable' simulation models instead of expensive complex ones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Productivity

If traditional design methods are used, then process simplicity is maintained, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing productivityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by using simulated results and predictive inferences to inform and improve subsequent design iterations. The simulation data provides feedback on material properties and consolidation characteristics, enabling continuous optimization of designs for improved productivity while managing process complexity through systematic analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables productivity improvements by systematically analyzing and optimizing manufacturing parameters such as consolidation track specifications and domain configurations. By changing and optimizing these parameters based on simulation data, the process achieves higher productivity while maintaining manageable complexity through structured parameter management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20220291661A1Additive manufacturing simulations
Publication Date: 2022.09.15 GENERAL ELECTRIC CO
  • US20220291661A1 patent drawing
  • US20220291661A1 patent drawing
  • US20220291661A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods of simulating additively manufacturing an object may include generating a simulated additively manufactured object based at least in part on a plurality of approximate consolidation domains that respectively correspond to a plurality of consolidation tracks determined from one or more digital representations of an additively manufactured object, and determining a predictive inference with respect to one or more material properties of the object to be additively manufactured based at least in part on the simulated additively manufactured object. Methods may include generating, for an object to be additively manufactured, a CAD file and/or a build file based at least in part on a simulated additively manufactured object and/or based at least in part on one or more predictive inferences with respect to one or more material properties of the object to be additively manufactured. An object may be additively manufactured based at least in part on a simulated additively manufactured object and/or a CAD file and/or the build file corresponding thereto.