Additive Manufacturing Support Structure with Segmented Pillars

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In additive manufacturing, existing supporting structures require excessive material for object support, leading to material waste and increased printing costs, as well as complicating the removal process due to their complexity.

Innovation Solution

A supporting structure is formed with an array of spire-shaped air pockets and pillars, where the pillars are reinforced with model material to provide structural support while minimizing the volume of support material needed, and a contact pad is used to interface with the object, allowing for efficient material removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional supporting structures are used in additive manufacturing, then object support during printing is ensured, but material waste increases and printing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject support during printingVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The supporting structure is divided into multiple discrete pillars arranged in arrays rather than continuous support material. Each pillar is a separate element that can be individually optimized, and the segmented structure uses significantly less material while maintaining support functionality during additive manufacturing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The supporting structure incorporates air pockets within and between pillars, creating a porous configuration. This reduces the overall material volume of the support structure while maintaining structural integrity sufficient to support overhanging features during the printing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

2Reliability

If traditional supporting structures are used in additive manufacturing, then object support during printing is ensured, but printing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject support during printingVSAvoidprinting costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the support structure into discrete pillars, the total material volume is reduced, directly lowering material costs. The segmented design also enables more efficient printing paths and reduced printing time, further decreasing manufacturing costs while maintaining adequate support functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If complex supporting structures are used in additive manufacturing, then object support during printing is ensured, but removal process becomes complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject support during printingVSAvoidsupport structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The segmented pillar structure consists of simple, discrete elements rather than complex continuous geometries. This segmentation makes the support structure easier to remove from the printed object, as the individual pillars can be more readily detached or dissolved without affecting the main object structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The porous configuration with air pockets reduces the material density and complexity of the support structure. This porosity facilitates easier removal through dissolution or mechanical detachment, as there is less material to remove and the open structure allows better access to the interface between support and object

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces material waste and printing costs by minimizing the volume of support material required, while simplifying the removal process through the use of soluble support materials and strategically placed reinforcements.

Implementation Method 1

The support material may be a polymer, which is water-soluble and/or capable of swelling and/or breaking down upon exposure to a liquid solution, e.g. water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDissolution: Solvation

Implementation Method 2

The photo-initiator may enable at least partial solidification of the support material by curing with the same UV light applied to the model material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotopolymerization: Photopolymerisation

Data Source

PatentUS20230041952A1Structure supporting an object during additive manufacturing and method for forming
Publication Date: 2023.02.09 STRATASYS LTD
  • US20230041952A1 patent drawing
  • US20230041952A1 patent drawing
  • US20230041952A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A supporting structure built together with an object in an additive manufacturing (AM) process and configured to support an overhang of the object is described. The supporting structure includes a first array of pillars formed with a first material and reinforced with a second material. Each of the pillars in the first array includes a top. At least a portion of the tops in the first array adjoin and define a surface on which the overhang of the object may be supported. The first material is support material.