AMHR2 Vaccine Composition for Ovarian Cancer Recurrence Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current therapeutic approaches for ovarian cancer, such as those using whole tumor homogenate or specific tumor-associated antigens, have provided only modest results, leading to high recurrence rates and low five-year survival rates, necessitating new compositions and methods for treatment and prevention.

Innovation Solution

Induction of an immune response against Anti-Mullerian Hormone Receptor, Type II (AMHR2) through administration of AMHR2 polypeptides, antigen-presenting cells, and AMHR2-primed lymphocytes, potentially combined with adjuvants and anti-cancer agents, to target ovarian cancer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional therapeutic approaches using whole tumor homogenate or tumor-associated antigens are used, then treatment can be administered, but the immune response is insufficient leading to high recurrence rates and low survival rates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficacyVSAvoidimmune response strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses composite vaccine formulations combining multiple antigen types (AMHR2 polypeptide, nucleic acid encoding AMHR2, antigen-presenting cells, and primed lymphocytes) to create a synergistic immune response that overcomes the insufficiency of single-antigen approaches and achieves reliable treatment efficacy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies immune response parameters by using adjuvants and multiple antigen delivery formats to enhance the strength and durability of the immune response, transforming the weak response from conventional therapies into a robust protective response against ovarian cancer

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If strong immune responses are induced against ovarian cancer antigens, then tumor growth is inhibited, but autoimmune complications may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmune response strengthVSAvoidautoimmune complications
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent targets the immune response locally to ovarian cancer tissue by using antigen-presenting cells and primed lymphocytes that specifically recognize AMHR2 on tumor cells, concentrating the immune attack at the tumor site while sparing normal tissues and minimizing autoimmune complications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses antigen-presenting cells as intermediaries that process and present AMHR2 antigens in a controlled manner, mediating between the vaccine antigen and the immune system to generate a targeted response that inhibits tumor growth without causing widespread autoimmune reactions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Duration of action of stationary object

If therapeutic vaccines are administered, then immune response is induced, but the response must be sustained over time to prevent recurrence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmune response durationVSAvoidtime to recurrence
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs primed lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells that are pre-prepared and loaded with tumor antigens before administration, creating an immediate and sustained immune response that provides long-term protection against cancer recurrence without requiring extended treatment periods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates continuous immune surveillance by using antigen-presenting cells and primed lymphocytes that maintain persistent antigen presentation and T-cell activation, ensuring continuous protective immunity against ovarian cancer recurrence over an extended period

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach induces a robust immune response, including type 1 and type 17 immune responses, effectively inhibiting ovarian cancer growth and recurrence with minimal autoimmune complications and no impact on fertility, as demonstrated in mouse models.

Implementation Method 1

administration of AMHR2 polypeptides, antigen-presenting cells, and AMHR2-primed lymphocytes, potentially combined with adjuvants and anti-cancer agents, to target ovarian cancer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImmune response induction:

Data Source

PatentUS20260060943A1Ovarian cancer vaccines
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUND
  • US20260060943A1 patent drawing
  • US20260060943A1 patent drawing
  • US20260060943A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided herein are methods, kits and compositions for the treatment and/or prevention of ovarian cancer through the induction of an immune response against Anti-Mullerian Hormone Receptor, Type II (AMHR2).