Amide Extractant Single-Cycle Nuclear Fuel Decontamination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The PUREX process for spent nuclear fuel processing is limited by insufficient decontamination factors for uranium and plutonium with respect to certain fission products and transuranium elements, requires reductive stripping of plutonium, generates unstable species, and produces secondary wastes due to TBP degradation, making it unsuitable for simpler and safer future processing plants.

Innovation Solution

A method using N,N-di(2-ethylhexyl)-3,3-dimethylbutanamide or a mixture of N,N-di(2-ethylhexyl)-isobutanamide and N,N-di(2-ethylhexyl)-n-butanamide as extractants to perform a single cycle of uranium and plutonium extraction, separation, and decontamination without reductive stripping, utilizing varying concentrations of nitric acid and specific reducing agents to achieve efficient separation and decontamination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If TBP is used as extractant in the PUREX process, then uranium and plutonium can be recovered via liquid-liquid extraction, but the decontamination factors with respect to certain fission products and transuranium elements are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecontamination factorVSAvoidnumber of purification cycles
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical parameter of the extractant from TBP to N,N-di(2-ethylhexyl)-3,3-dimethylbutanamide (DEHDMBA), which fundamentally alters the extraction chemistry. This parameter change enables superior decontamination factors in a single cycle, resolving the contradiction between decontamination effectiveness and process complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts and removes problematic fission products and transuranium elements more effectively into separate phases, achieving higher purity in the uranium and plutonium streams. This enhanced extraction capability eliminates the need for multiple purification cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Manufacturing precision

If reductive stripping of plutonium is performed to partition uranium and plutonium into two aqueous streams, then separation is achieved, but high amounts of reducing and anti-nitrous agents are required which generate unstable and reactive species

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepartitioning precisionVSAvoidunstable and reactive species
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using reducing agents that create harmful unstable species, the patent employs an amide extractant that naturally provides the desired partitioning through selective complexation. The harmful reduction step is replaced by a benign extraction mechanism that achieves the same separation goal without generating reactive byproducts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The chemical reduction mechanism is replaced by a selective complexation mechanism. The amide extractant forms stable complexes with uranium and plutonium in different oxidation states, enabling separation without the need for reducing agents and their associated safety hazards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If TBP is used as extractant, then uranium and plutonium extraction is achieved, but TBP degradation products lead to formation of metal complexes that may cause retaining of plutonium in the solvent

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction efficiencyVSAvoidplutonium recovery reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs an amide extractant that is more chemically stable and resistant to degradation under process conditions. This extractant maintains its effectiveness throughout the extraction process without degrading into products that would interfere with plutonium recovery, ensuring reliable operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses a specific class of amide compounds (N,N-di(2-ethylhexyl)-3,3-dimethylbutanamide) that combine the desirable extraction properties needed for uranium and plutonium recovery with enhanced chemical stability. This composite molecular structure provides both high extraction efficiency and resistance to degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Ease of operation

If the process is simplified to a single cycle without reductive stripping, then operational simplicity and safety are improved, but adequate decontamination and separation must still be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoiddecontamination factor
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the extractant parameter to an amide-based compound that provides inherently superior selectivity and decontamination capability. This parameter change enables a single-cycle process to achieve the same or better decontamination factors that previously required multiple cycles with TBP.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The amide extractant performs multiple functions simultaneously: it extracts uranium and plutonium, provides adequate decontamination from fission products and transuranium elements, and enables partitioning without requiring additional reducing agents. This multi-functionality allows process simplification while maintaining performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method allows for efficient recovery and decontamination of uranium and plutonium in a single cycle, reducing the need for multiple cycles, eliminating reductive stripping risks, and minimizing secondary waste production, while improving the safety and compactness of nuclear fuel processing.

Implementation Method 1

a co-extraction of uranium and plutonium from the aqueous solution, this co-extraction comprising at least one contacting, in an extractor, of the aqueous solution with an organic solution comprising from 1 mol/L to 2 mol/L of N,N-di(2-ethylhexyl)-3,3-dimethylbutanamide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLiquid-liquid extraction: Liquid-Liquid Extraction

Implementation Method 2

a partitioning of the uranium and plutonium contained in the organic solution resulting from step b) into an aqueous solution and an organic solution

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLiquid-liquid extraction: Liquid-Liquid Extraction

Data Source

PatentUS10249396B2Method for the treatment of an aqueous nitric solution resulting from dissolving spent nuclear fuel, said method being performed in a single cycle and without requiring any operation involving reductive stripping of plutonium
Publication Date: 2019.04.02 ORANO RECYCLAGE
  • US10249396B2 patent drawing
  • US10249396B2 patent drawing
  • US10249396B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for the treatment of an aqueous solution resulting from the dissolution of a spent nuclear fuel in nitric acid, allowing the uranium and plutonium contained in the solution to be extracted, separated and decontaminated in a single cycle, without requiring any operation involving a reductive stripping of plutonium. Applications for the method include the processing of uranium-based and/or plutonium-based spent nuclear fuels.