Ammonia-Based Aeration Control with Dynamic SRT Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ammonia-based aeration control systems in wastewater treatment plants face challenges in maintaining consistent solids retention time (SRT) during peak loads and energy efficiency, as existing systems may not effectively handle varying loads and can reach minimum airflow constraints.

Innovation Solution

Integration of a dynamic SRT controller with ammonia-based aeration control (ABAC) to adjust airflow, dissolved oxygen, and solids retention time through a supervisory control system, ensuring consistent nitrification and reduced energy consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by stationary object

If ammonia-based aeration control is used to reduce energy consumption, then energy efficiency improves, but solids retention time consistency deteriorates during peak loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaeration energy consumptionVSAvoidsolids retention time consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by stationary objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the solids retention time setpoint based on real-time ammonia measurements and operational conditions. The SRT setpoint is not fixed but varies dynamically to maintain nitrification efficiency during peak loads while optimizing energy consumption during normal operation. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by allowing SRT to adapt to changing conditions rather than remaining static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback control mechanism where ammonia measurements from the aeration tank are continuously monitored and fed back to adjust both the aeration rate and SRT setpoint. This closed-loop feedback ensures that SRT consistency is maintained during peak loads by detecting ammonia level changes and responding with appropriate SRT adjustments, while still allowing energy optimization when conditions permit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If minimum airflow constraints are applied to ensure adequate mixing, then mixing effectiveness improves, but aeration control flexibility deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing effectivenessVSAvoidaeration control flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The minimum airflow constraint is not applied rigidly but is dynamically adjusted based on ammonia levels and operational conditions. When ammonia levels indicate peak loads or nitrification challenges, the system temporarily reduces or suspends the minimum airflow constraint to allow greater aeration flexibility. When conditions are stable, the constraint is applied to ensure adequate mixing. This dynamic application resolves the contradiction by making the constraint adaptive rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If ammonia-based aeration control adjusts airflow to meet effluent limits, then nitrification efficiency improves, but energy consumption increases during peak loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenitrification efficiencyVSAvoidaeration energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the ammonia setpoint parameter dynamically based on operational conditions. During peak loads, the ammonia setpoint is adjusted to allow slightly higher effluent ammonia levels temporarily, which reduces the aeration intensity required and thereby reduces energy consumption. When conditions permit, the setpoint is tightened to maximize nitrification efficiency. This parameter change resolves the contradiction by allowing temporary trade-offs between efficiency and energy use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The ABAC-SRT control system effectively manages peak loads, maintains consistent nitrification, and reduces energy consumption by optimizing airflow and solids retention time, providing a more stable and efficient treatment process.

Implementation Method 1

The air is introduced using blowers that force air through pipes that feed diffusers within the aeration tanks

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAeration: Aeration

Implementation Method 2

A certain type of bacteria can also convert ammonia into nitrite and nitrate to provide its energy requirements in a process known as nitrification

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNitrification: Oxidation

Data Source

PatentUS10399876B2Ammonia-based aeration control with SRT Control
Publication Date: 2019.09.03 INCTRL SOLUTIONS INC
  • US10399876B2 patent drawing
  • US10399876B2 patent drawing
  • US10399876B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Total ammonia nitrogen in a volume of sludge in an aeration tank is measured and compared to a target ammonia nitrogen setpoint to calculate an airflow target for adjusting the measured total ammonia nitrogen toward the target ammonia nitrogen setpoint. The airflow target may be an airflow rate or, for an SBR, an airflow duration, and airflow into the aeration tank is adjusted according to the airflow target. A target solids retention time setpoint is also calculated from information relating to the airflow target and the solids retention time is adjusted toward the target solids retention time setpoint. The waste activated sludge flow rate for the aeration tank may be adjusted to adjust the solids retention time for the aeration tank toward the target solids retention time setpoint.