AMOLED Pixel Compensation via Grouped Row Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large-sized AMOLED displays face challenges in brightness uniformity due to the immaturity of electrical compensation techniques, leading to significant errors in brightness compensation when TFT characteristics change before a new I-V model is established.

Innovation Solution

An organic light emitting diode pixel compensation method that involves testing drive transistors in specific rows to obtain test information, calculating a compensation parameter based on this information, and applying it to adjacent rows to compensate for brightness, thereby reducing data detection time and compensation errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If external compensation method is used with row-by-row scanning and original I-V model, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates due to significant errors when TFT characteristics change

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompensation system complexityVSAvoidbrightness compensation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The display panel rows are divided into multiple groups, with each group containing multiple rows. Instead of compensating row-by-row sequentially, the method tests drive transistors in one row and applies the compensation parameters to multiple rows within the same group, segmenting the compensation process into group-based operations that reduce detection time while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method performs preliminary testing of drive transistors to obtain test information before actual display operation. By pre-calculating compensation parameters based on TFT characteristics (threshold voltage and mobility) and applying them in advance to multiple rows, the system eliminates delays associated with real-time row-by-row compensation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If row-by-row testing and compensation is performed, then measurement coverage is improved, but loss of time increases due to long update period of compensation parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompensation parameter accuracyVSAvoidcompensation parameter update time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The method merges the compensation process across multiple rows by testing drive transistors in one row and applying the same compensation parameters to multiple other rows within a group. This combining approach significantly reduces the total time required for compensation parameter updates while maintaining measurement accuracy through selective testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of testing every row individually (excessive action), the method performs partial testing on selected rows and extrapolates compensation parameters to other rows in the group. This partial action approach reduces the time loss associated with comprehensive row-by-row testing while maintaining sufficient compensation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10803803B2Organic light emitting diode pixel compensation method, organic light emitting diode pixel compensation device and display device
Publication Date: 2020.10.13 BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO LTD
  • US10803803B2 patent drawing
  • US10803803B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An organic light emitting diode pixel compensation method, an organic light emitting diode pixel compensation device and a display device are provided. The organic light emitting diode pixel compensation method includes: testing drive transistors of sub-pixels in an Nth row to obtain first test information; testing drive transistors of sub-pixels in an Mth row to obtain second test information; calculating a compensation parameter based on the first test information and the second test information; and compensating the sub-pixels in the Nth row, the sub-pixels in the Mth row and the sub-pixels in a rows adjacent to the Nth row and the Mth row based on the compensation parameter, where N=an+b, M=an+c, a≥2, 0≤b<a, 0≤c<a, and a, b, c and n are each an integer.