Amorphous Metal Workpiece Geometry for Critical Cooling Rates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current manufacturing processes for amorphous metals face challenges in achieving amorphous properties due to limitations in cooling rates, leading to crystallization issues, especially in larger workpieces, and require precise control of cooling behavior to prevent structural defects.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for adapting component descriptions of metallic workpieces to ensure amorphous properties by determining and adjusting the cooling behavior, incorporating coolant descriptions and material selection, and optimizing geometry using finite element simulations to maintain cooling rates below critical thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the volume of the melt is increased to produce larger workpieces, then the productivity and applicability of amorphous metals is improved, but the cooling rate decreases leading to crystallization before amorphous solidification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkpiece volumeVSAvoidcooling rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent determines the cooling behavior of the workpiece through simulation and adapts the component description by modifying geometric parameters. By changing the shape and dimensions of the workpiece, the cooling rate distribution is optimized to maintain amorphous solidification even in larger volumes. The simulation allows prediction of cooling rates at different locations, enabling parameter adaptation before manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling behavior is determined and the component description is adapted before the actual manufacturing process. This preliminary simulation and adaptation step allows the workpiece geometry to be optimized in advance to ensure sufficient cooling rates throughout the volume, preventing crystallization issues before they occur during production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Length of stationary object

If the component thickness is increased to produce thicker workpieces, then the productivity and material efficiency is improved, but the cooling rate becomes insufficient leading to crystallization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent thicknessVSAvoidcooling rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The simulation determines the cooling behavior throughout the workpiece volume, identifying regions where thickness may cause insufficient cooling. The component description is then adapted by modifying local geometric parameters to optimize heat dissipation while maintaining the desired amorphous structure, enabling production of thicker components without crystallization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the component description is adapted to ensure sufficient cooling rates, then the amorphous properties and material quality is improved, but the manufacturing process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamorphous property consistencyVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical trial-and-error manufacturing iterations with a computational simulation approach. The cooling behavior is determined through numerical simulation, and the component description is automatically adapted based on simulation results. This substitution of computational methods for physical experimentation reduces overall process complexity while ensuring reliable amorphous properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the production of workpieces with consistent amorphous properties by ensuring efficient heat dissipation and precise temperature control, preventing crystallization and enhancing mechanical and chemical properties.

Implementation Method 1

To prevent crystallization of the alloy during cooling from the melt, a critical cooling rate must be exceeded

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRapid cooling: Cooling

Implementation Method 2

the alloy can be formed not only by melt metallurgy but also by thermoplastic forming at comparatively low temperatures, similar to thermoplastics or silicate glasses. For this purpose, the metallic glass is first heated above its glass transition temperature

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGlass transition: Phase Change

Implementation Method 3

Considering that the thermal energy stored in the melt must be dissipated sufficiently quickly through the system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentEP3871804B1Method for adapting a component description of a workpiece to be manufactured with amorphous properties
Publication Date: 2024.11.06 HERAEUS AMLOY TECH GMBH
  • EP3871804B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3871804B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3871804B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

Amorphous metals are a novel class of materials with advantageous physical properties. Amorphous metals require rapid cooling during injection molding, which is not achieved for many geometries. The invention relates to a method for adapting a component description of a workpiece to be manufactured with amorphous properties, comprising: - determining the cooling behavior of at least a part of a workpiece to be manufactured, taking into account a component description of the workpiece; - adapting at least a part of the component description, taking into account the determined cooling behavior of the workpiece.