Ampholyte Biomaterials Resolving Biocompatibility and Strength Trade-off

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current biomaterials for medical devices face challenges with biocompatibility, mechanical strength, and functionality, particularly in contact lenses and blood-contacting devices, where existing polymers either lack biocompatibility or mechanical strength.

Innovation Solution

Development of synthetic polymeric ampholyte biomaterials mimicking natural cell membrane components, such as 2-((2-hydroxyethyl)dimethylammonio)ethyl hydrogen phosphate, which exhibit high biocompatibility, haemocompatibility, and hydrophilicity, and can be integrated into or grafted onto various polymer backbones to enhance properties like mechanical strength, non-thrombogenicity, and drug delivery capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If natural hydrophilic polymers (collagen, alginates, hyaluronic acid) are used, then biocompatibility is improved, but mechanical strength deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovebiocompatibilityVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates composite materials by integrating ampholyte compounds with synthetic polymer backbones (polycarbonates, polyesters, polyurethanes, polysiloxanes). This combination allows the material to exhibit both the biocompatibility of natural polymers and the mechanical strength of synthetic polymers, resolving the contradiction between these two properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If artificially synthesized polymers (polyesters, polyethers, polycarbonates) are used, then mechanical strength is improved, but biocompatibility deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidbiocompatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by incorporating ampholyte compounds at specific locations within the polymer structure (as pendant groups, side chains, or crosslinking agents). This localized modification of synthetic polymer backbones with biocompatible functional groups enables the material to maintain high mechanical strength while acquiring improved biocompatibility where it contacts biological systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If phospholipid compounds are polymerized, then biocompatibility is improved, but mechanical strength and processability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovebiocompatibilityVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional approach by not polymerizing phospholipid compounds directly, but rather integrating them as ampholyte compounds into pre-formed synthetic polymer backbones. This reversal of the synthesis sequence allows the robust synthetic backbone to provide mechanical strength and processability, while the integrated phospholipid-derived ampholyte groups provide biocompatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentEP2723752B1Biocompatible, biomimetic ampholyte materials
Publication Date: 2020.08.05 BIOINTERACTIONS LTD
  • EP2723752B1 patent drawing
  • EP2723752B1 patent drawing
  • EP2723752B1 patent drawing

AI summary

New ampholyte biomaterial compounds containing ampholyte moieties are synthesized and integrated into polymeric assemblies to provide hydrophilic polymers exhibiting improved biocompatibility, haemocompatibiiity, hydrophihcity non-thrombogenicity, anti-bacterial ability, and mechanical strength, as well as suitability as a drug delivery platform