Wireless Power Amplifier Control for Saturation and Blocker Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Wireless communication devices face inefficiencies due to power amplifier saturation, leading to increased power consumption, reduced battery life, and failure to meet network power specifications, while also experiencing interference from blockers that degrade signal transmission.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that detect power amplifier saturation and blockers by analyzing changes in signal power and bias voltage, adjusting the bias voltage to prevent saturation, and delaying signal transmission updates during blocker detection to mitigate interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If the bias voltage is increased to amplify signal power, then the signal power increases, but the power consumption increases and battery life decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal powerVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the output signal power and compares it with the input control voltage to detect saturation conditions. When saturation is detected, the system provides feedback to adjust the control voltage, preventing further increases in bias voltage that would only increase power consumption without improving signal power. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures optimal power efficiency by eliminating wasteful voltage increases beyond the saturation point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the bias voltage parameter based on detected saturation conditions. By monitoring the relationship between control voltage and output power, the system identifies when further voltage increases yield diminishing returns. It then modifies the voltage parameter to operate in the optimal linear region, thereby reducing power consumption while maintaining adequate signal power levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Power

If the power amplifier operates in saturation to reach maximum signal power, then the signal power reaches maximum level, but the amplifier cannot respond to power control commands and transmit power control accuracy degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal powerVSAvoidtransmit power control accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism that monitors the output signal power and compares it with the control voltage. When saturation is detected (where output power stops increasing despite voltage increases), the system provides feedback to reduce the control voltage back to the linear operating region. This ensures the amplifier remains responsive to power control commands and maintains accurate transmit power control while still achieving the desired maximum signal power levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection of saturation conditions by monitoring the relationship between control voltage and output power before the amplifier fully enters saturation. By detecting the approaching saturation state in advance, the system can take preliminary action to adjust the control voltage and prevent saturation from occurring, thereby maintaining transmit power control accuracy and amplifier responsiveness to control commands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Power

If the power amplifier operates in saturation, then the bias voltage continues to increase, but the amplifier gain only nominally increases and power consumption increases without benefit

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamplifier gainVSAvoidenergy waste
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback to monitor the actual amplifier gain by comparing output signal power with control voltage. When saturation is detected (where gain stops increasing despite voltage increases), the feedback mechanism reduces the control voltage to the optimal operating point. This eliminates energy waste by preventing further bias voltage increases that would consume additional power without providing any meaningful gain improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs self-service by automatically detecting saturation conditions and adjusting its own operating parameters. The amplifier monitors its own output characteristics and autonomously modifies its bias voltage to maintain optimal efficiency. This self-regulating mechanism prevents energy waste by ensuring the amplifier operates in the linear region where voltage increases translate to proportional gain increases, rather than wasting energy in saturation where such increases provide no benefit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If signal transmission is continued during blocker interference, then communication continues, but signal integrity degrades and transmitted signals may not reach destination or become unreadable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication continuityVSAvoidsignal integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by monitoring the relationship between control voltage and output signal characteristics. When blocker interference is detected (indicated by abnormal saturation patterns or unexpected output levels), the feedback mechanism triggers appropriate responses such as adjusting power levels, pausing transmission, or activating interference mitigation techniques. This maintains signal integrity while minimizing disruption to communication continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary anti-action by detecting the presence of blockers through monitoring saturation patterns and signal characteristics before significant degradation occurs. Upon detecting blocker interference, the system takes preemptive action to adjust transmission parameters, reduce power, or pause communication to prevent signal unreadability. This preliminary protective action maintains signal integrity while minimizing impact on communication continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentEP2509219B1Method and system for controlling signal transmission of a wireless communication device
Publication Date: 2017.11.15 INTEL IP CORP
  • EP2509219B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2509219B1 patent drawingFigure 2a
  • EP2509219B1 patent drawingFigure 2b

AI summary

In accordance with the present disclosure, disadvantages and problems associated with controlling signal transmission of a wireless communication device may be reduced. In accordance with an example embodiment of the present disclosure a method for controlling transmission of a wireless communication signal comprises sensing one or more signals indicative of a power level of a wireless communication signal. The power level of the wireless communication signal is amplified by a power amplifier according to an amplifier control signal. The method further comprises determining a change in the power level based on the one or more signals indicative of the power level. The change is associated with one or more perturbations of the amplifier control signal. The method also comprises adjusting transmission of the wireless communication signal according to the change in the power level.