AMR Intersection Reservation Control for Manufacturing Traffic Conflicts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In manufacturing environments, the defined paths of autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) often coincide at intersections, leading to inefficiencies in automated tasks due to path and timing conflicts.

Innovation Solution

A method for controlling a plurality of AMRs in a manufacturing environment with an intersection management system. This system determines arrival times based on velocity and routes, generates intersection reservations considering priority information, and controls AMR movement through intersections based on these reservations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple AMRs travel along defined paths that coincide at intersections, then the manufacturing environment can utilize efficient predefined routes, but path conflicts occur at intersections leading to reduced efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of automated tasksVSAvoidtime lost due to path conflicts at intersections
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by determining arrival times for each AMR at intersections before actual traversal occurs. Intersection reservations are generated in advance based on these predicted arrival times, allowing the system to preemptively schedule and prevent conflicts before they happen, thereby maintaining high productivity without time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The intersection reservation system acts as an intermediary mechanism between multiple AMRs sharing common paths. By introducing this scheduling layer, the system mediates access to intersections, allocating time slots to different AMRs based on their arrival times and priority information, thus resolving path conflicts while preserving the efficiency of predefined routes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If the system implements intersection reservations and scheduling mechanisms, then path conflicts are prevented and task execution efficiency improves, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of automated tasksVSAvoidcomplexity of intersection management system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each AMR independently provides self-service by reporting its own velocity information and route, allowing the system to determine its arrival time at intersections. The AMR then receives an intersection reservation autonomously without requiring complex centralized coordination for each individual robot, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the system prioritizes AMRs based on payload type and physical characteristics, then critical tasks are executed with higher priority, but the control logic becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepriority-based task executionVSAvoidcomplexity of priority determination logic
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies parameter changes by using payload type and physical characteristics of AMRs as input parameters to determine priority information. These parameters directly influence the intersection reservation allocation, allowing the system to dynamically adjust priority based on task criticality and robot capabilities without requiring complex control logic, thereby ensuring reliable task execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12280781B2Systems and methods for controlling autonomous mobile robots in a manufacturing environment
Publication Date: 2025.04.22 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US12280781B2 patent drawing
  • US12280781B2 patent drawing
  • US12280781B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for controlling a plurality of autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) in a manufacturing environment having an intersection includes obtaining a plurality of routes associated with the plurality of AMRs, velocity information associated with the plurality of AMRs, and priority information associated with the plurality of AMRs, and determining a plurality of arrival times associated with the plurality of AMRs based on the velocity information and the plurality of routes. The method includes generating a plurality of intersection reservations based on the plurality of arrival times and the priority information, where each intersection reservation from among the plurality of intersection reservations corresponds to an AMR from among the plurality of AMRs, and controlling a movement of the plurality of AMRs through the intersection based on the plurality of intersection reservations.