AMR Safety Protocol Switching for Confined Warehouse Zones

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous mobile robots (AMRs) face challenges in safely navigating confined spaces due to their programmed safety protocols not being adequate for smaller or more confined areas within facilities like warehouses or factories, potentially leading to collisions with objects or people.

Innovation Solution

AMRs switch to a safety protocol specific to the confined space by connecting to a safety controller when entering, and revert to their programmed protocol when leaving, ensuring safe operation in both open and confined areas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If AMRs operate with a fixed programmed safety protocol, then the robot can operate autonomously in open spaces, but the robot cannot ensure safe operation in confined spaces with different safety requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety protocol adaptabilityVSAvoidsafety system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety protocol is made dynamic by allowing it to change based on the robot's location. The system transitions from a static, fixed safety protocol to a dynamic one that adapts to different environmental contexts (open spaces vs. confined spaces), enabling the robot to comply with location-specific safety requirements while maintaining autonomous operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

A safety controller acts as an intermediary between the robot's navigation system and the safety protocol enforcement mechanism. This intermediary receives location information, determines the appropriate safety protocol, and enforces it during navigation operations within confined spaces, thereby resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity by centralizing the decision-making logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If AMRs use a single safety protocol for all areas, then the system is simple to implement, but the robot may collide with objects or people in confined spaces with different safety requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision preventionVSAvoidsafety protocol management
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The facility is segmented into different zones (open spaces and confined spaces), each with its own safety protocol requirements. The system divides the navigation space and applies appropriate safety protocols to each segment, thereby improving collision prevention in confined spaces while managing complexity through spatial segmentation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different safety protocols are applied to different locations within the facility. Confined spaces have stricter safety requirements (local quality) compared to open spaces. The system implements location-specific safety measures, ensuring high reliability in collision prevention where needed most while maintaining manageable complexity through localized protocol application

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If AMRs switch safety protocols based on location, then the robot ensures safe operation in diverse environments, but the system requires complex protocol switching and connection management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental adaptabilityVSAvoidprotocol switching operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The robot autonomously determines when it is entering or exiting confined spaces using its sensors and navigation system. It self-manages the protocol switching process by automatically connecting to the safety controller upon detection of confined space entry and disconnecting when exiting, thereby achieving environmental adaptability while maintaining ease of operation through automated self-service functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12379723B1Autonomous mobile robot using multiple safety protocols
Publication Date: 2025.08.05 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12379723B1 patent drawing
  • US12379723B1 patent drawing
  • US12379723B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes operating an autonomous mobile robot (AMR) in a first physical location according to a first safety protocol of the AMR and based on a location of the AMR relative to a second physical location different from the first physical location and with a second safety protocol different from the first safety protocol, switching the AMR to operate under the second safety protocol rather than the first safety protocol while the AMR is located in the second physical location. The method also includes, in response to detecting that the AMR is exiting the second physical location after the AMR has completed operating in the second physical location, switching the AMR to operate under the first safety protocol.