Analog Beamformer Using Locked Oscillators Instead of Phase Shifters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing beamformers for array antennas suffer from significant signal loss, amplitude errors, and phase errors due to the use of phase shifters, especially at higher frequencies like millimeter waves, which also complicate feeder path routing and increase chip area and cost.

Innovation Solution

An analog beamformer architecture that eliminates phase shifters by using local oscillators with frequency-and-phase-locking networks, where power and grounding ports are connected to form resonant networks, enabling phase adjustment without the drawbacks of phase shifters, thus minimizing power loss and errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If phase shifters are used in the beamformer architecture, then phase adjustment capability is provided, but signal loss increases significantly at higher frequencies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase adjustment capabilityVSAvoidsignal loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes phase shifters from the beamformer architecture entirely, extracting the problematic component that causes signal loss. Instead of using phase shifters to adjust phase, the invention uses a different approach: multiple local oscillators with controlled frequency offsets that naturally produce the required phase differences through frequency tuning, eliminating the need for phase shifting operations that cause energy loss at millimeter wave frequencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operating parameters of local oscillators by applying different frequency offset controls to each oscillator. This parameter change (frequency offset) directly produces the desired phase differences in the mixed signals without requiring phase shifters. By controlling the frequency of local oscillators rather than shifting phase after mixing, the system achieves phase adjustment capability without the associated signal loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If phase shifters are used in the beamformer architecture, then phase control is achieved, but amplitude errors are introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase controlVSAvoidamplitude error
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes phase shifters from the system, eliminating the source of amplitude errors that accompany phase control in conventional architectures. The replacement method uses frequency-offset local oscillators combined with mixing, which provides phase control through frequency manipulation rather than phase shifting, thereby avoiding the amplitude errors that plague phase shifter-based systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the mechanical/electrical phase shifting mechanism with a frequency-based control mechanism. Instead of using phase shifters that physically or electrically adjust phase (which introduce amplitude errors), the system uses local oscillators with controlled frequency offsets that produce phase differences through the mixing process, replacing the problematic phase control mechanism with a cleaner frequency control approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If phase shifters are used in the beamformer architecture, then phase adjustment is possible, but phase errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase adjustmentVSAvoidphase error
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes phase shifters from the architecture, eliminating the component that introduces phase errors. The phase adjustment function is replaced by controlling the frequency offsets of multiple local oscillators, which generate phase differences through frequency tuning rather than phase shifting. This extraction of the error-prone phase shifter component and replacement with frequency-controlled oscillators directly addresses the phase error problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the control parameter from phase shifting to frequency offset control. By controlling the frequency of local oscillators through offset adjustments rather than using phase shifters, the system achieves phase adjustment with higher precision. The frequency offset parameter provides a more accurate and stable means of controlling phase relationships compared to phase shifter mechanisms, reducing phase errors in the final beamformed output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of manufacture

If phase shifters are implemented as integrated circuits, then the beamformer can be integrated, but chip area is occupied by transmission lines and inductors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegrated circuit implementationVSAvoidchip area
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes phase shifters from the integrated circuit architecture, eliminating the need for large transmission lines and inductors that would otherwise be required on the chip. By replacing phase shifters with frequency-offset local oscillators and mixers, the design reduces the area occupied by passive components while maintaining integrated circuit manufacturability. The active mixing approach requires smaller footprint components compared to the passive transmission line and inductor structures needed for phase shifting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

5Reliability

If multiple sets of mixers are added to the beamformer architecture, then frequency conversion is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency conversionVSAvoidnumber of mixers
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the frequency conversion and phase adjustment functions into a unified approach using multiple local oscillators with frequency offsets. Instead of adding separate mixer sets for different functions, the invention merges frequency conversion with phase control by having each local oscillator perform both roles simultaneously through its frequency-offset signal. This merging reduces the total number of mixers needed while maintaining reliable frequency conversion across all antenna channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces signal transmission power loss, avoids amplitude and phase errors, and minimizes chip area, facilitating efficient millimeter-wave beamforming with improved feeder path layout.

Implementation Method 1

multiple local oscillators... provide multiple local-oscillating signals with consistent frequency but different phases

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOscillation: Harmonic Oscillator

Implementation Method 2

The mixers individually receive the intermediate-frequency signal and one of the local oscillating signals, and the mixers provide multiple mixed signals

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFrequency mixing: Heterodyne

Implementation Method 3

The frequency locking circuit is only coupled to one of the local oscillators and then lock in the frequency of the coupled local oscillator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFrequency locking: Feedback

Implementation Method 4

Several radio-frequency amplifying circuits receive the mixed signals to provide multiple radio-frequency signals with consistent frequency but different phases to different antennas

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSignal amplification: Magnetic Amplifier

Data Source

PatentEP4167490B1Analog beamformer used for array antenna and operating method thereof
Publication Date: 2025.09.10 IND TECH RES INST
  • EP4167490B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP4167490B1 patent drawingFigure 1C~1D
  • EP4167490B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

An analog beamformer used for array antenna (100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600) and an operating method thereof are provided. The analog beamformer used for array antenna (100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600) includes an intermediate-frequency amplifying circuit (VGAIF), multiple local oscillators (OSCi-OSCn, OSCx), multiple mixers (Mixer1-Mixern, Mixerx), multiple radio-frequency amplifying circuits (VGA1-VGAn, VGAx), and a frequency locking circuit (130). The analog beamformer uses a master-oscillator and multiple slave-oscillators which embed a resonant network of frequency-and-phase-locking. The intermediate-frequency amplifying circuit (VGAIF) receives a baseband signal (SBB) to provide an intermediate-frequency signal (SIF). Power supplies or grounding ports of different local oscillators (OSC1-OSCn, OSCx) are connected together to provide multiple local-oscillating signals (CLKL1-CLKLn) with consistent frequency but different phases. The mixers (Mixer1-Mixern, Mixerx) individually receive the intermediate-frequency signal (SIF) and one of the local-oscillating signals (CLKL1-CLKLn) to provide multiple mixed signals (Smx1-Smxn). The radio-frequency amplifying circuits (VGA1-VGAn, VGAx) receive the mixed signals (Smx1-Smxn) to provide multiple radio-frequency signals (SRF1-SRFn) with consistent frequency but different phases to each antenna (ANT1-ANTn). The frequency locking circuit (130) only locks a frequency of one of the local-oscillating signals (CLKL1-CLKLn).