Analog Synthesizer Patch Morphing via Automated Motor Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Analog synthesizers lack the ability to smoothly transition between sounds due to limited control over knob positions and patch connections, making it difficult for users to accurately reproduce and document sounds, and they cannot store patch connections between modules.

Innovation Solution

The use of a user input device such as a joystick or pressure-sensitive pad to control all synthesizer inputs, including knob positions and patch connections, allowing for proportional adjustments and interpolation between settings, enabling real-time adjustment of all synthesizer settings without manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual knob adjustment and patch cable connections are used, then the synthesizer can be operated, but smooth transitions between sounds and proportional control cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesmooth sound transitionsVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical knob adjustment and patch cable connections with an automated control system using motors, potentiometers, and electronic switches. This substitution enables smooth, proportional transitions between synthesizer parameters without manual intervention, resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and device complexity by automating the control mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic control through automated motors and electronic switches that can adjust parameters continuously and proportionally. The system transitions from static, discrete knob positions to dynamic, continuously adjustable settings, enabling smooth sound morphing while managing complexity through integrated electronic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If patch cables are used for module connections, then the synthesizer can be configured, but proportional control between fully off and fully on states cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatch connection control rangeVSAvoidconnection control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces binary patch cable connections with electronic switches controlled by motors and electronic circuits. This substitution enables proportional control of signal routing between modules, allowing connections to be adjusted anywhere between fully off and fully on states, thereby increasing adaptability while managing complexity through electronic control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If infinite knobs are used, then the synthesizer can be adjusted, but accurate documentation and reproduction of sounds become difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter adjustment flexibilityVSAvoidsound setting documentation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms through position sensors on motors and electronic switches that continuously monitor parameter settings. This feedback enables the system to accurately track and document the state of each parameter, allowing for precise reproduction of sounds while maintaining the flexibility of continuous adjustment, thereby resolving the information loss problem.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If manual knob and switch adjustment is used, then the synthesizer can be operated, but real-time control of all parameters simultaneously cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter adjustment speedVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple independent control mechanisms (motors, potentiometers, electronic switches) into a unified automated control system. This integration enables simultaneous control of all parameters through a single interface, dramatically increasing productivity by allowing real-time adjustment of multiple parameters at once while managing complexity through system integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10770048B2Analog synthesizer patch morphing and simultaneous parameter control though input devices
Publication Date: 2020.09.08 LAFAYETTE COLLEGE
  • US10770048B2 patent drawing
  • US10770048B2 patent drawing
  • US10770048B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sound generating analog synthesizer comprising a controller electronically connected to rotate at least one knob, actuate at least one switch, and make at least one patch connection; said knob comprising a drive system, a shaft position sensor, and a potentiometer; wherein said controller rotates at least one knob by generating instructions to said drive system; said at least one switch comprising an electronic connection to said controller to turn on or off said switch upon receiving instructions from said controller; and at least one patch connection, comprising at least one patch switch, wherein said at least one patch switch controls connection between at least one input of said patch and at least one output of said patch; and a control system to interpolate the potentiometer, switch and patch connections between at least two predetermined settings.