Analysis Condition Estimation Using Sensitivity Matrix Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Determining input information for analysis methods such as FEM requires time-consuming trial and error, particularly for parameters like heat input distribution normal deviation, which is typically determined through experiments.

Innovation Solution

An estimation method involving a measurement step, a first and second analysis step, and a calculation step using sensitivity matrices to iteratively minimize errors, allowing quick and accurate estimation of analysis conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If trial and error method is used to determine input information for analysis, then the analysis condition can be determined, but it takes a long time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of analysis conditionVSAvoidtime for determining analysis condition
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the approach from trial-and-error parameter adjustment to systematic parameter estimation using sensitivity analysis. By calculating sensitivity matrices that quantify how output responses change with input parameters, the method directly computes optimal parameter values rather than searching through trials, thereby reducing time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the mechanical trial-and-error process with a computational mathematical system. Instead of manually adjusting parameters based on trial results, the system uses automated sensitivity analysis and matrix calculations to determine optimal parameters, substituting human iterative adjustment with algorithmic computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If experiment is conducted to determine input information such as normal deviation, then the value can be obtained, but it requires time-consuming trials and errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalue of normal deviationVSAvoidtime for experiment and trial
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention creates a virtual copy of the physical experiment through numerical analysis. Instead of conducting actual physical experiments to measure normal deviation, the method uses computational models with sensitivity analysis to estimate the parameter values, providing equivalent information without the time cost of physical trials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The invention substitutes physical experimentation with computational analysis. By replacing the mechanical experiment process with mathematical sensitivity analysis and parameter estimation algorithms, the method achieves the same measurement precision without the time-consuming nature of physical trials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Loss of information

If sensitivity analysis is performed to find ratio of change in output to change in input, then the relationship can be understood, but it requires multiple analysis steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunderstanding of input-output relationshipVSAvoidnumber of analysis steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges multiple sensitivity analysis steps into a unified parameter estimation process. By combining the sensitivity matrix calculation, error computation, and parameter update steps into an integrated iterative algorithm, the method maintains comprehensive understanding of input-output relationships while reducing the apparent complexity through systematic organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention implements feedback loops where analysis results are continuously fed back to refine parameter estimates. The error between measured and calculated values is used to update sensitivity matrices and adjust parameters iteratively, creating a self-correcting system that improves accuracy through repeated cycles of analysis and refinement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260017433A1Estimation method for estimating estimation target included in analysis condition, analysis method, program, and estimation device
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 PUBLIC UNIVERSITY CORPORATION OSAKA CITY UNIVERSITY
  • US20260017433A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017433A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017433A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a method to quickly and accurately estimate an estimation target within an analysis condition. This method includes: measuring data at least one measurement point; performing a first analysis using an analysis condition with the estimation target to obtain a result; performing a second analysis by applying perturbation to the estimation target value used in the first analysis to obtain a result; and calculating a sensitivity matrix based on the first and second analysis results, calculating the error between the first analysis result and the measurement data or data derived from it, and determining the amount to adjust the estimation target value from the sensitivity matrix and error.