Medical Analyzer Control Ranges via Peer Group Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current quality control (QC) processes for medical analyzers are inefficient and time-consuming, particularly when establishing control ranges, which are often wide and unreliable when sourced from manufacturers, and require internal testing that takes valuable time and makes devices unavailable for use.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that determines peer control ranges for medical analyzer devices by processing measurement results from a set of predefined QC samples, discarding outliers, and using statistical functions to establish precise and narrow control ranges, allowing for centralized management and efficient resource allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If manufacturer control ranges are used, then the QC process is simple to implement, but the control ranges are wide and have questionable reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementing QC processVSAvoidreliability of control ranges
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary internal testing during the initialization phase to establish device-specific control ranges before the device enters routine operation. This preliminary action ensures that reliable, narrow control ranges are available from the start without affecting ongoing QC processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The medical analyzer automatically performs internal testing and establishes its own control ranges without requiring manual intervention from laboratory personnel. The device uses its own measurement results to determine peer control ranges, making the process self-service and eliminating the need for external QC range establishment procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If internal testing is performed to establish control ranges, then more narrow and reliable control ranges are obtained, but the process is time consuming and makes the analyzer unavailable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of control rangesVSAvoidtime for establishing control ranges
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary internal testing during the initialization phase to establish device-specific control ranges before the device enters routine operation. This preliminary action ensures that reliable, narrow control ranges are available from the start without affecting ongoing QC processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A peer group of similar analyzers acts as an intermediary to provide reference measurement results. The system uses statistical functions on peer group data to determine peer control ranges, which then serve as the basis for establishing the device's own control ranges. This intermediary approach eliminates the need for time-consuming manual internal testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If internal testing is performed to establish control ranges, then more narrow and reliable control ranges are obtained, but the analyzer is made unavailable for use during that time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of control rangesVSAvoidavailability of analyzer
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary internal testing during the initialization phase to establish device-specific control ranges before the device enters routine operation. This preliminary action ensures that reliable, narrow control ranges are available from the start without affecting ongoing QC processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A peer group of similar analyzers acts as an intermediary to provide reference measurement results. The system uses statistical functions on peer group data to determine peer control ranges, which then serve as the basis for establishing the device's own control ranges. This intermediary approach eliminates the need for time-consuming manual internal testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240428931A1Control ranges for devices for biological sample analysis
Publication Date: 2024.12.26 RADIOMETER AS
  • US20240428931A1 patent drawing
  • US20240428931A1 patent drawing
  • US20240428931A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method performed by a central system for establishing control ranges for a plurality of remote medical analyzer devices is disclosed. The method comprises obtaining a plurality of measurement results associated with a plurality of quality control (QC) measurements performed by a plurality of medical analyzer devices on a set of predefined QC samples. Each QC sample is associated with a predefined target range and wherein each medical analyzer device is associated with a peer group of medical analyzer devices. The method further comprises determining, for each peer group out of a plurality of peer groups, a peer control range for each predefined QC sample by processing the plurality of measurement results of the peer group in view of the associated target range. Furthermore, the method comprises determining, for each medical analyzer device, a control range for each predefined QC sample based on the determined peer control range of the associated peer group. The method further comprises transmitting, to a device for managing at least one medical analyzer device, data indicative of the determined control ranges for the set of predefined QC samples for the at least one medical analyzer device.