Analyzing Device Maintenance Guide Sorting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current maintenance procedures for analyzing devices are inefficient due to varying maintenance frequencies and complexities, leading to duplication of effort, increased operator burden, and difficulty in managing multiple maintenance tasks, especially for inexperienced operators working under time constraints.

Innovation Solution

An analyzing device with a management system that displays maintenance items in order of performance, allowing both operator-performed and machine-performed tasks to be shown together, using a sorting rule list to optimize the sequence and reduce redundant procedures, thereby minimizing labor and time required for maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If maintenance items are managed separately with different frequencies, then each maintenance task can be tracked individually, but the overall maintenance process becomes complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance tracking accuracyVSAvoidmaintenance management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple separate maintenance items into a single integrated maintenance guide. The control unit generates one comprehensive maintenance guide that includes all maintenance items (both automatic and manual) with their respective frequencies, replacing the need for multiple separate tracking systems. This merging reduces management complexity while maintaining reliable tracking of each individual maintenance task through the unified guide.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Manufacturing precision

If maintenance procedures are performed item-by-item according to manuals, then each maintenance task can be completed accurately, but the total time and labor required increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance execution accuracyVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit performs preliminary actions by automatically generating a sorted maintenance guide before the operator begins maintenance work. The guide pre-arranges all maintenance items in the optimal execution order, identifying which tasks can be performed simultaneously or in sequence. This preliminary organization eliminates the need for operators to consult multiple manuals and plan procedures step-by-step, reducing execution time while maintaining accuracy through the structured guide.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If multiple maintenance items are performed simultaneously, then efficiency improves, but the risk of missing critical steps or affecting apparatus measurement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance efficiencyVSAvoidmeasurement stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The maintenance guide dynamically adapts to the apparatus state by indicating which maintenance items can be performed simultaneously and which require sequential execution. The control unit analyzes the relationships between maintenance items and provides dynamic guidance on parallel versus sequential execution, allowing operators to maximize efficiency while maintaining measurement stability through context-aware recommendations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of manufacture

If inexperienced operators perform maintenance without guidance, then personnel costs are reduced, but the quality and accuracy of maintenance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational costVSAvoidmaintenance quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides self-service functionality by generating an automated maintenance guide that serves as an intelligent companion for operators. The guide independently identifies all required maintenance items, sorts them by execution order, and provides clear instructions without requiring external expert intervention. This self-generated guidance enables inexperienced operators to perform maintenance with the same quality as experts would, while reducing reliance on costly specialized personnel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP2682755B1Analysis device
Publication Date: 2019.02.27 HITACHI HIGH TECH CORP
  • EP2682755B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2682755B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2682755B1 patent drawingFigure 3a

AI summary

An analyzing device requires regular maintenance for maintaining a predetermined analyzing performance thereof. However, the more complex the analyzing device becomes, the more number of maintenance items are provided. For example, if a plurality of types of maintenances to be performed by removing same component, efficiency may be improved by performing the same as a whole. However, when conforming with a manual, if recommended timings to perform the maintenance are shifted delicately, there is a probability of occurrence of a case where the same components are removed several times for maintenance during a short time. At the time when an instruction to perform maintenance is issued, maintenance items to be performed are extracted, the extracted maintenance items are sorted into a recommended performance order in conformity to a preset rule such that the similar maintenance or the maintenance of the same portion or the like are performed continuously.