Anatomical Map Opening Identification Using Medial-Axis Branches

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing anatomical mapping techniques, particularly for cardiac chambers like the left atrium, struggle to accurately identify and visualize anatomical openings such as pulmonary veins and the left atrium appendage, requiring manual input from experts and leading to potential errors in diagnostic procedures.

Innovation Solution

A processor-based method that computes a medial axis graph, simplifies it to identify major branches, and uses this graph to automatically orient and identify pulmonary veins and the appendage, followed by a semi-automatic or automatic cutting process to remove irrelevant structures from the map.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual identification methods are used for anatomical openings, then expert judgment can be applied, but time consumption increases and errors may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic identification of anatomical openings using computational algorithms that process the anatomical map independently, without requiring manual intervention. The medial axis graph computation and automated detection algorithms enable the system to self-identify and locate openings such as pulmonary veins and left atrium appendage, eliminating the need for expert manual annotation while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual expert judgment with computational mechanisms. The system uses mathematical algorithms to compute medial axis graphs, calculate geodesic distances, and automatically detect anatomical openings based on geometric and topological characteristics, substituting the mechanical process of manual analysis with automated computational processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automated identification algorithms are used, then time consumption decreases, but complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the complex task of anatomical opening identification into sequential manageable steps: first computing the medial axis graph, then calculating geodesic distances from reference points, identifying candidate openings based on distance thresholds, and finally validating against anatomical models. This segmentation allows the complex algorithm to be implemented systematically while maintaining computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary computation of the medial axis graph and pre-identification of major branches before the actual opening detection. By preparing the anatomical map structure in advance and pre-calculating geometric properties, the system reduces the computational burden during the actual identification phase, thereby increasing processing speed despite the inherent complexity of the algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Quantity of substance

If the anatomical map includes all structures, then completeness is maintained, but visualization clarity decreases due to irrelevant structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural completenessVSAvoidvisualization clarity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically identifies and extracts irrelevant anatomical structures from the complete map. By detecting the boundaries of relevant structures such as pulmonary veins and left atrium appendage, the system separates these from other anatomical elements, creating a cleaned-up visualization that maintains completeness of relevant structures while removing distracting irrelevant information to improve visualization clarity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different processing qualities to different regions of the anatomical map. Relevant structures identified through the medial axis graph analysis receive enhanced processing and are highlighted or isolated for clear visualization, while irrelevant structures are either suppressed or rendered with reduced prominence. This localized differentiation maintains the completeness of the anatomical representation while optimizing visualization clarity for the specific clinical task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP3961564B1Automatic identification and processing of anatomical structures in an anatomical map
Publication Date: 2026.03.11 BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD
  • EP3961564B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3961564B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3961564B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method includes calculating a medial-axis tree graph of a volume of an organ of a patient in a computerized anatomical map of the volume. A predefined number of major branches in the tree graph are identified. Using the identified major branches, one or more known anatomical opening regions of the volume are identified in the anatomical map.