Anatomical Model Manufacturing via Segmented Molding and Composite Pouring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for manufacturing anatomical models using 3D printing face limitations in replicating the texture, resistance, and transparency of soft organs, and fail to effectively position internal elements within the models, leading to suboptimal realism and practicality for surgical simulation and training.

Innovation Solution

A process involving image capture and processing, followed by computer modeling to generate main and internal molds, positioning internal elements using auxiliary rods, and integrating them with a pouring process using parenchyma and filling materials, allowing for realistic reproduction of anatomical structures, including soft tissues and internal elements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If direct 3D printing of soft organs is used, then anatomical models can be produced, but the texture, resistance, and transparency are not accurately replicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetexture and transparency replicationVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The manufacturing process is divided into multiple stages: creating molds from 3D scans, preparing separate parenchyma and filling materials, and assembling them in layers. This segmentation allows each material to be optimized for its specific properties (transparency, texture, resistance) while maintaining ease of manufacture through standardized procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite materials consisting of parenchyma material for the outer tissue layers and filling material for internal structures. This combination enables accurate replication of different tissue properties - the parenchyma provides transparency and soft tissue texture, while the filling material provides structural support and internal organ representation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Manufacturing precision

If internal elements are positioned in anatomical models, then realism is improved, but the positioning accuracy and integration with external elements is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracy of internal elementsVSAvoidintegration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Molds are created in advance with pre-defined cavities and positioning features that guide the placement of internal elements. The 3D scanning and modeling process identifies optimal positions for internal structures before manufacturing begins, ensuring accurate positioning without complex assembly procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Internal elements are positioned within nested cavities in the parenchyma material. The molding process creates hierarchical nesting where internal organs are placed within their anatomical contexts, with each layer of tissue containing the next, replicating the natural nested structure of biological organs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Manufacturing precision

If different materials are used for parenchyma and filling, then texture and resistance are improved, but material cost and processing complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetexture and resistance accuracyVSAvoidmaterial processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Different materials with specific properties are used in different locations: transparent or translucent parenchyma material for outer tissue layers that require visual inspection, and opaque filling material for internal structures where structural support is prioritized. This local differentiation achieves anatomical accuracy without uniformly increasing complexity across the entire model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The process achieves anatomical models that accurately represent the shape, size, texture, and resistance of biological structures, enhancing realism and usability for diagnosis, surgery simulation, and teaching, while improving demolding and material efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

capturing one or more diagnostic images of a structure to be reproduced, for example using CT, MRI or ultrasound techniques

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray: X-Ray

Implementation Method 2

capturing one or more diagnostic images of a structure to be reproduced, for example using CT, MRI or ultrasound techniques

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMRI: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 3

pouring the filling material and, if appropriate, the parenchyma into the molds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Implementation Method 4

The process may comprise a step for applying a vacuum to the molds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Data Source

PatentEP3675083B1Process for manufacturing anatomical models
Publication Date: 2022.12.14 CONSTR ELECTROMECANICAS DEL TER

AI summary

PROCESS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF ANATOMICAL MODELS which from images obtained and the creation of editable and printable files comprises a sub-process for generating main moulds, a sub-process for generating internal elements, a sub-process for positioning the internal elements which when these include soft elements comprises a step of reversible stiffening, a sub-process for integrating the internal elements comprising a step of pouring of parenchyma and an demoulding step and a post-processing sub-process.