Anchor Process Indication for Wireless Acknowledgement Signaling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-frequency wireless communication systems, particularly those using millimeter waves, face challenges in efficiently handling acknowledgement processes due to the need for precise timing and physical properties, leading to increased signaling overhead, especially with the ubiquitous use of beamforming.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a method that uses an anchor process indication and relative process indication to transmit acknowledgement signaling, allowing for a dynamic codebook that omits unnecessary processes, thereby reducing signaling overhead by using a relative indication that requires fewer bits than a full ID, particularly suitable for 5G and future wireless communication systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If full process IDs are used to indicate acknowledgement processes, then process identification is complete and unambiguous, but signaling overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess identification accuracyVSAvoidsignaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the process indication into two parts: a group ID that identifies a group of acknowledgement processes, and a relative process indication that identifies the specific process within that group. This segmentation allows the system to use smaller indication fields while maintaining complete process identification capability, thereby reducing signaling overhead without sacrificing identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a hierarchical dimension to process indication by organizing acknowledgement processes into groups. Instead of using a single flat identifier, the system uses a two-dimensional approach: group ID (first dimension) and relative process indication (second dimension). This dimensional change enables more efficient encoding and reduces the total number of bits required for process identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If a dynamic codebook is used to omit unnecessary processes, then signaling efficiency improves, but codebook management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignaling efficiencyVSAvoidcodebook management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic codebook where the set of acknowledgement processes is not fixed but can be adjusted based on actual communication needs. The codebook is dynamically configured through group IDs and relative process indications, allowing the system to include or exclude specific processes from acknowledgement signaling as required, thereby improving signaling efficiency while adapting to varying system conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Quantity of substance

If relative process indication is used instead of full ID, then number of bits required is reduced, but interpretation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of bitsVSAvoidinterpretation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary organization of acknowledgement processes into groups with assigned group IDs before the actual indication takes place. This preliminary action creates a structured framework where relative process indications can be efficiently interpreted. The receiving device is pre-configured with the group structure, so when a relative indication is received, the interpretation is straightforward: combine the known group ID with the relative indication to identify the target process, minimizing interpretation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240313901A1Anchor process indication
Publication Date: 2024.09.19 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US20240313901A1 patent drawing
  • US20240313901A1 patent drawing

AI summary

There is disclosed a method of operating a feedback radio node in a wireless communication network. The method includes transmitting acknowledgement signaling based on a received control information message, wherein the control information message includes an anchor process indication indicating an anchor acknowledgement process, and/or wherein the control information message comprises a relative process indication indicating an acknowledgement process relative to an anchor process. The disclosure also pertains to related devices and methods.