Angled Acoustic Standing Wave Particle Deflection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional acoustophoresis devices face limitations in separating particles or cells at high flow rates and low concentrations, leading to decreased separation efficiency, and are costly and prone to clogging, particularly in industries such as food and beverage processing and water treatment.

Innovation Solution

The use of a flow chamber with an ultrasonic transducer and reflector to create an angled acoustic standing wave oriented at an acute angle relative to the flow direction, deflecting particles without trapping them, allowing for higher flow rates and efficient separation of cells or particles by size, density, and acoustic contrast.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional acoustophoresis devices are used to separate particles or cells, then separation can be achieved, but separation efficiency decreases at high flow rates and low concentrations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rateVSAvoidseparation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dimensionality change by orienting the acoustic standing wave at an acute angle (20-70 degrees) relative to the flow direction, rather than perpendicular or parallel. This angular configuration creates a three-dimensional acoustic radiation force field that effectively deflects particles from the main flow stream, enabling high flow rates while maintaining separation efficiency. The angled wave configuration allows particles to be separated in a direction component that does not directly oppose the flow, thus avoiding the efficiency loss that occurs in conventional perpendicular configurations at high flow rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If filter cartridges and filter membranes are used to filter particles from liquids, then filtration can be achieved, but devices become expensive and clogged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltration capabilityVSAvoidcost and clogging resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical filtration system (filter cartridges and membranes) with an acoustic field-based separation system. Instead of using physical filters that can clog and become expensive, the invention uses acoustic radiation forces generated by ultrasonic transducers to deflect particles from the flow. This substitution eliminates the mechanical filtering components that are prone to clogging, reduces operational costs, and maintains reliable separation capability through non-contact acoustic forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If macro-scale acoustic separators are used, then particle separation can be achieved, but flow rates are too low to be feasible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation capabilityVSAvoidflow rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the acoustic wave orientation angle (20-70 degrees) and acoustic power density to achieve effective particle deflection at high flow rates. By adjusting these parameters, the system maintains separation capability while enabling flow rates suitable for industrial applications. The angled configuration allows the acoustic forces to act component-wise against the flow, reducing the total acoustic power required compared to perpendicular configurations, thus enabling higher flow rates with feasible energy input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables efficient separation and fractionation of particles or cells at flow rates up to 700 mL/min, reducing clogging and operational costs, and is applicable in various industries including food and beverage and water treatment.

Implementation Method 1

at least one ultrasonic transducer located on a wall of the flow chamber, the transducer including a piezoelectric material driven by a voltage signal to create an angled acoustic standing wave in the flow chamber oriented at an acute angle relative to the direction of mean flow through the flow chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic standing wave: Sound

Implementation Method 2

By applying the acoustic standing wave to the host fluid at an angle thereto, desired deflection of the particles can be achieved

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic radiation force: Acoustic Radiation Pressure

Implementation Method 3

the transducer including a piezoelectric material driven by a voltage signal to create an angled acoustic standing wave

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 4

a reflector located on a wall on an opposite side of the flow chamber from the at least one ultrasonic transducer, and the reflector is designed and positioned to create a standing wave along the acute angle direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS10550382B2Acoustophoretic device for angled wave particle deflection
Publication Date: 2020.02.04 FLODESIGN SONICS INC
  • US10550382B2 patent drawing
  • US10550382B2 patent drawing
  • US10550382B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Devices for separating materials from a host fluid are disclosed. The devices include a flow chamber, an ultrasonic transducer, and a reflector. The ultrasonic transducer and reflector create an angled acoustic standing wave oriented at an angle relative to the direction of mean flow through the flow chamber. The angled acoustic standing wave results in an acoustic radiation force having an axial force component that deflects the materials, so that the materials and the host fluid can thus be separated. The angled acoustic standing wave can be oriented at an angle of about 20° to about 70° relative to the direction of mean flow through the flow chamber to deflect, collect, differentiate, or fractionate the materials from the fluid flowing through the device at flow rates of about 400 mL/min up to about 700 mL/min.