Angled Beam Floating Seal for Aircraft Engine Gap Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional seal designs in aircraft engines are prone to beam imbalance, leading to 'saw-toothing' and excessive rubbing or leakage due to limited beam length and parallel configuration, which restricts the range of shoe movement and compromises gap control.

Innovation Solution

The seal features a four-bar linkage with beams angled relative to the shoe, allowing equal radial movement at different circumferential locations, minimizing imbalance and increasing the range of shoe deflection, thereby enhancing beam balance and reducing wear and leakage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If beams are arranged parallel to the shoe, then the seal structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but beam imbalance occurs leading to saw-toothing and excessive rubbing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam arrangement simplicityVSAvoidbeam balance stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by orienting the beams at different angles relative to the shoe rather than parallel arrangement. Specifically, the first beam is oriented at a first angle and the second beam at a second angle, where the angles are different. This asymmetric configuration prevents the saw-toothing effect and beam imbalance that occur with parallel beams, while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through standardized angular orientations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Ease of manufacture

If beams are arranged parallel to the shoe, then manufacturing is easier, but the range of shoe movement is limited due to limited beam length

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam configuration simplicityVSAvoidshoe movement range
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a one-dimensional parallel beam arrangement to a two-dimensional angular configuration. By orienting beams at different angles (first angle and second angle) relative to the shoe, the design exploits angular dimensionality to increase the effective range of shoe movement without proportionally increasing beam length, thereby improving adaptability while maintaining manufacturing simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If beams are made longer to increase shoe movement range, then adaptability improves, but beam imbalance and saw-toothing increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshoe movement rangeVSAvoidbeam balance stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by implementing asymmetric angular orientations for the beams. The first beam is oriented at a first angle and the second beam at a second angle, creating an asymmetric configuration that balances the forces on the shoe during movement. This allows longer beams to be used effectively to increase shoe movement range while the asymmetric angles prevent beam imbalance and saw-toothing, maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

4Reliability

If angled beam configuration is used, then beam balance and shoe movement range improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam balance stabilityVSAvoidbeam orientation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the angular orientation parameters of the beams. Specifically, it sets the first beam at a first angle and the second beam at a second angle relative to the shoe, where these angles are controlled parameters. This parameter-based approach allows systematic optimization of beam balance and shoe movement range while managing device complexity through defined angular specifications rather than arbitrary configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This angled configuration ensures balanced beam movement, reduces wear and leakage, and allows for longer beams, providing enhanced control and compliance in the sealing system.

Implementation Method 1

the beams and the shoe form a four-bar linkage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFour-bar linkage: Four-Bar Linkage

Implementation Method 2

an associated pressure field changes. This change induces the shoe to move

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure field: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentEP3290646B1Floating, non-contact seal with angled beams for use in aircraft engines
Publication Date: 2020.07.29 RTX CORP
  • EP3290646B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3290646B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP3290646B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

Aspects of the disclosure are directed to a floating, non-contact seal (318) comprising a shoe (336), a first beam (330a) coupled to the shoe (336), and a second beam (330b) coupled to the shoe (336), where the first beam (330a) is oriented at a first angle with respect to the shoe (336), the first angle having a first value that is greater than five degrees.