Angled Bone Cutting Guide for Metatarsal Osteotomy Precision

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current surgical techniques for correcting bunion deformities, such as the Reverdin osteotomy, lack precision due to the absence of guides, leading to infrequent performance of this procedure and potential complications.

Innovation Solution

Development of bone cutting guides with angled reference surfaces and temporary fixation mechanisms that allow for precise alignment and cutting of metatarsal bones, enabling accurate realignment and stabilization during surgery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If freehand cutting is used for Reverdin osteotomy, then surgical flexibility is maintained, but cutting precision and alignment accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical flexibilityVSAvoidcutting precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The guide is designed with pre-determined angular orientations (e.g., 30 degrees relative to the metatarsal shaft) and geometric configurations that establish the precise cutting angles before surgery. The surgeon simply attaches the guide to the bone and performs cutting along the pre-planned paths, eliminating the need for complex intraoperative angle calculations while maintaining surgical flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The guide acts as an intermediary device between the surgeon's intent and the actual cutting process. It translates the desired cutting angles and paths into physical guide surfaces and openings that direct the cutting tool, ensuring precise reproduction of the planned osteotomy geometry without requiring the surgeon to manually measure and calculate angles during surgery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If guides are introduced for precise cutting, then cutting precision is improved, but device complexity and surgical procedure complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting precisionVSAvoidguide complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The guide incorporates specific geometric features (angled reference surfaces, openings, notches) only at the locations where precision is needed for cutting guidance. The rest of the guide structure remains simple and adaptable. This localized complexity approach provides precise cutting guidance where required while keeping the overall device simple and easy to use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The guide is designed to be adaptable to different osteotomy configurations and surgical scenarios. The same basic guide structure can accommodate various cutting angles and patterns by changing the attachment position or using different guide templates, reducing the need for multiple specialized guides and simplifying the overall device set.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If precise angular cuts are performed, then bone realignment accuracy is improved, but surgical time and procedure duration increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverealignment accuracyVSAvoidsurgical time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

All angular measurements, geometric configurations, and cutting paths are predetermined and encoded into the guide's physical structure during manufacturing. During surgery, the surgeon only needs to attach the guide to the bone and follow the pre-established guidance features, eliminating time-consuming intraoperative measurements and angle calculations while achieving high realignment accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Stability of the object's composition

If temporary fixation devices are used to secure the guide, then guide stability is improved, but additional surgical steps and procedure complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguide stabilityVSAvoidprocedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The temporary fixation mechanism is integrated directly into the guide structure, with fixation openings and attachment features built into the guide body. This combines the guide and fixation system into a single unit, eliminating the need for separate fixation devices and procedures while ensuring stable guide attachment during the cutting process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP3091911B1Resection guides
Publication Date: 2020.10.14 ZIMMER INC
  • EP3091911B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3091911B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3091911B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

Resection guides, implants and methods are disclosed. A guide may include a plate with a first end opposite a second end and a medial portion extending therebetween. The guide may also include at least one opening in the first end of the plate. The guide may further include at least one hole positioned along a longitudinal axis of the plate near the at least one opening. Surgical methods for using the guide for bone and joint fusions is also disclosed.