Angled Bracket Mechanical Down-Stop for Heavy-Duty Axle Suspension

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mechanical down-stops for heavy-duty vehicle axle/suspension systems are prone to malfunction and damage due to complex designs, high weight, and increased maintenance costs, particularly when subjected to extreme downward forces, and they fail to provide adequate compliance and strong attachment to the vehicle frame.

Innovation Solution

A mechanical down-stop with an L-shaped or angled bracket made of elastically deformable material, providing a stronger and more compliant attachment to the vehicle frame, eliminating the need for a clevis-type mounting bracket and reducing the number of links, thus enhancing the system's ability to react downward forces without compromising the connection to the frame.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a complex mechanical down-stop design with multiple links and clevis-type mounting bracket is used, then the downward movement of the beam is limited, but the device weight increases and reliability decreases under extreme downward forces

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical down-stop is divided into two functional segments: a rigid attachment portion that provides strong connection to the vehicle frame, and a flexible interlinked portion that limits downward beam movement. This segmentation allows each part to specialize in its function, improving overall reliability while reducing unnecessary complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts and eliminates the clevis-type mounting bracket and associated connectors from the design. By integrating the mounting function directly into the rigid attachment portion with simplified geometry, the design reduces component count and complexity while maintaining or improving reliability under extreme forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If a complex mechanical down-stop design with multiple links and connectors is used, then the downward movement of the beam is limited, but the manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges multiple components (mounting bracket, connectors, and linkages) into an integrated structure where the rigid attachment portion and flexible interlinked portion work as a unified system. This consolidation reduces manufacturing steps, assembly operations, and overall production cost while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

By removing the clevis-type mounting bracket and associated connectors, the invention reduces the bill of materials and manufacturing complexity, directly lowering production costs while preserving the essential function of limiting downward beam movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Strength

If a rigid attachment of the mechanical down-stop to the vehicle frame is provided, then the attachment strength increases, but the compliance decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment strengthVSAvoidcompliance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The down-stop is segmented into a rigid attachment portion for strong frame connection and a flexible interlinked portion for compliant beam attachment. This segmentation allows the system to simultaneously achieve high attachment strength at the frame interface while maintaining compliance at the beam interface through the flexible linkage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the down-stop have different mechanical properties: the attachment to the vehicle frame is rigid for strength, while the connection to the beam is flexible for compliance. This local differentiation of mechanical properties allows the system to satisfy both contradictory requirements in different locations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Weight of moving object

If the number of links in the mechanical down-stop is reduced, then the device weight decreases, but the ability to limit downward movement may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveweightVSAvoiddownward movement limitation
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the geometric parameters and configuration of the flexible interlinked portion to achieve effective downward movement limitation with fewer links. By optimizing link length, arrangement, and pivot points, the system maintains its beam-stopping function while reducing total link count and weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a stronger, more compliant mechanical down-stop that effectively limits downward movement, reduces vehicle weight and manufacturing costs, and minimizes potential damage to the axle/suspension system components, while maintaining efficient operation and durability.

Implementation Method 1

The angled bracket is formed of an elastically deformable material and includes a bend that enables the bracket to act as a spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10308088B2Mechanical down-stop for axle/suspension systems
Publication Date: 2019.06.04 HENDRICKSON USA LLC
  • US10308088B2 patent drawing
  • US10308088B2 patent drawing
  • US10308088B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mechanical down-stop for heavy-duty vehicle axle/suspension systems which includes an angled bracket that is rigidly/stiffly attached to the vehicle frame at one end, and is attached to a flexible portion of the mechanical down-stop at its other end. The flexible portion is attached to a beam of the axle/suspension system. The angled bracket is formed of an elastically deformable material and includes a bend that enables the bracket to act as a spring. The angled bracket and the flexible portion limit downward movement and react the downward force of the beam.