Angled Card Cage for Front-to-Back Cooling Airflow

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cooling systems in telecommunications equipment face challenges with pressure head loss when implementing front-to-back airflow, particularly in space-constrained environments, as they require additional vertical rack height and result in reduced cooling air flow efficiency due to sharp turns and increased impedance.

Innovation Solution

An electronics enclosure with a card cage oriented at a non-orthogonal yaw angle, featuring a smaller cross-sectional plenum leading to the air inlet and a larger cross-sectional plenum leading to the air exhaust, along with strategically placed fans to minimize pressure losses and enhance airflow, allowing for a more efficient cooling air flow path from the front to the back.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If front to back cooling airflow is implemented in standard card cages, then cooling effectiveness is improved, but pressure head loss increases due to sharp turns and increased impedance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling effectivenessVSAvoidpressure head loss
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies curved surfaces instead of sharp angles to guide airflow. Specifically, the intake and exhaust openings are positioned at angled orientations (e.g., 45 degrees) relative to the card cage faces, creating curved airflow paths that reduce turbulence and pressure losses compared to sharp 90-degree turns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces asymmetric positioning of intake and exhaust openings at different angles on the card cage structure. The non-uniform angular arrangement creates optimized airflow patterns that reduce overall pressure head loss while maintaining effective cooling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Temperature

If front to back cooling airflow is implemented, then cooling performance is improved, but additional vertical rack height is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling performanceVSAvoidvertical rack height
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reorients the cooling airflow from a vertical direction (requiring additional rack height) to a horizontal front-to-back direction. By positioning intake and exhaust openings on the front and rear faces of the card cage at specific angles, the airflow path is redirected along the horizontal dimension, eliminating the need for extra vertical space while maintaining cooling effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of manufacture

If card cage is oriented with horizontal cards, then ease of installation is improved, but cooling airflow efficiency is reduced due to sharp turns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of installationVSAvoidcooling airflow efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses angled openings (e.g., 45 degrees) on the card cage to create curved airflow paths that connect the horizontal card orientation with efficient cooling airflow. This angular configuration allows air to flow smoothly from the front intake through the horizontal cards to the rear exhaust without sharp 90-degree turns, maintaining both installation ease and cooling efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces pressure head loss by up to 10% and increases airflow rate by 28%, providing improved cooling effectiveness while maintaining a compact form factor, and also allows for a greater bending radius of cables, enhancing mechanical reliability and ease of maintenance.

Implementation Method 1

at least one fan operative to force air to flow along an airflow pathway that extends from the air inlet into the first plenum, through the card cage, into the second plenum, and out the air exhaust

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS9241425B1Angled card cage for improved cooling airflow in front to back airflow products
Publication Date: 2016.01.19 WSOU INVESTMENTS LLC
  • US9241425B1 patent drawing
  • US9241425B1 patent drawing
  • US9241425B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An angled card cage for improved cooling airflow in front to back airflow products is disclosed. The angled card cage for improved cooling airflow includes a card cage having horizontally mounted circuit cards wherein the card cage is oriented at a non-orthogonal yaw angle relative to the front facing of an equipment rack. The angled card cage for improved cooling airflow provides advantages over systems known in the art by reducing pressure head losses incurred by the cooling air stream.