Angled Core Gas Turbine Engine Mounting for Aircraft Survivability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional gas turbine engine configurations are limited in their ability to accommodate alternate aircraft architectures, as they are designed for specific wing and fuselage configurations, restricting the flexibility in mounting locations and potentially compromising aircraft survivability due to the risk of engine failure fragmentation.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves a unique configuration where two gas turbine engine cores are mounted at angled positions relative to each other, with each core positioned outside the other's 'burst zone' to prevent interference and ensure survivability, utilizing a reverse flow gas turbine engine design with angled propulsor and engine axes, allowing for alternate aircraft architectures and side-by-side mounting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional gas turbine engine configurations are used, then engine operation is reliable, but adaptability to alternate aircraft architectures is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to alternate aircraft architecturesVSAvoidengine configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by skewing the engine core axis relative to the propulsor axis, creating an asymmetric mounting configuration that enables alternate aircraft architectures. This asymmetric arrangement allows the engine to be mounted in non-conventional positions while maintaining proper operation, thereby improving adaptability without significantly increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimensional aspect by angling the engine core axis at approximately 30 degrees relative to the propulsor axis. This angular offset creates a three-dimensional mounting configuration that accommodates alternate aircraft architectures, transforming the traditional coplanar arrangement into a spatial configuration that provides architectural flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If engines are mounted closer together to enable alternate architectures, then adaptability improves, but risk of fragmentation interference increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting location flexibilityVSAvoidfragmentation interference risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the potential harm of fragmentation into a beneficial design constraint by defining burst zones and establishing minimum angular separations. The skew angle configuration naturally positions engines such that their burst zones do not overlap, transforming the fragmentation risk into a geometric solution that simultaneously enables close mounting while ensuring safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by pre-defining burst zones around each engine and configuring the skew angle to ensure engines are positioned outside each other's burst zones. This preventive geometric arrangement eliminates fragmentation interference before it can occur, allowing engines to be mounted in close proximity without safety concerns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Adaptability or versatility

If engine cores are positioned at angled positions, then mounting flexibility improves, but manufacturing and assembly difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting configuration flexibilityVSAvoidengine mounting assembly ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by establishing a specific skew angle parameter (approximately 30 degrees) between the engine core axis and propulsor axis. This standardized angular parameter provides mounting flexibility while maintaining manufacturability, as the fixed angle can be incorporated into the engine design and assembly fixtures, reducing the complexity that would arise from arbitrary angular configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10001063B2Angled core gas turbine engine mounting
Publication Date: 2018.06.19 RTX CORP
  • US10001063B2 patent drawing
  • US10001063B2 patent drawing
  • US10001063B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A propulsion system for an aircraft includes first and second turbine engines mounted within a fuselage of the aircraft. The first turbine engine includes a first engine core that drives a first propulsor disposed about a first propulsor axis. The second turbine engine includes a second engine core and a second propulsor disposed about a second propulsor axis parallel to the first propulsor axis. The first engine core and the second engine core are mounted at an angle relative to corresponding ones of the first and second propulsor axes.