Angled Junction Plane Locking for Perpendicular Furniture Panels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing furniture panels with mechanical locking devices lack sufficient stiffness and strength, making them difficult to assemble and disassemble correctly, and are prone to incorrect installation and instability.

Innovation Solution

The design involves panels with a mechanical locking device featuring a flexible tongue and a rod-shaped element, where the junction plane extends at an angle, allowing for perpendicular locking in multiple directions, and includes a rod-shaped element that guides correct assembly, enhancing stability and ease of use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a simple mechanical locking device is used, then the device is easy to manufacture, but the stiffness and strength are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidstiffness and strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The locking device is divided into multiple functional components: a first locking element (tongue) for primary engagement, a second locking element (rod-shaped) for reinforcement, and a groove structure for guidance. This segmentation allows each component to contribute specifically to strength while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking device combines different structural elements (flexible tongue, rigid rod-shaped element, groove) that work together composite-like to achieve superior strength and stiffness properties that individual elements could not provide alone, while each element remains manufacturable using standard processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If a complex locking device is used to improve strength, then the stiffness and strength are improved, but the device becomes difficult to assemble and disassemble

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestiffness and strengthVSAvoidease of assembly and disassembly
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The first locking element is designed as a flexible tongue that can dynamically deform during assembly to accommodate misalignment, then springs into a locked position. This dynamic behavior simplifies assembly while maintaining strong locking, and allows easy disassembly by reversing the deformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The groove structure acts as an intermediary that guides the rod-shaped locking element into proper alignment during assembly, reducing the complexity of manual positioning while ensuring correct installation for optimal strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If a simple locking device is used, then the device is easy to use, but the risk of incorrect installation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of useVSAvoidrisk of incorrect installation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The groove structure and rod-shaped locking element are designed to self-align during assembly, automatically guiding components into the correct position without requiring precise manual positioning. This self-aligning mechanism prevents incorrect installation while maintaining ease of use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The groove is pre-formed in the panel to establish the correct installation path before the locking elements are inserted. This preliminary structural feature ensures that subsequent assembly steps naturally follow the correct sequence and orientation, reducing installation errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of manufacture

If a simple locking device is used, then the device is easy to manufacture, but the stability and aesthetics of the furniture product are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidstability and aesthetics
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The multi-element locking structure segments the load-bearing functions across multiple components, improving the overall stability and rigidity of the joint while each component remains simple to manufacture using standard woodworking or metalworking processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration improves the stiffness and strength of the locking device, reduces the risk of incorrect installation, and facilitates easy assembly and disassembly while providing a stable and aesthetically pleasing furniture product.

Implementation Method 1

the locking element comprises a flexible tongue arranged in an insertion groove

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11466717B2Mechanical locking system for panels
Publication Date: 2022.10.11 VÄLINGE INNOVATION AB
  • US11466717B2 patent drawing
  • US11466717B2 patent drawing
  • US11466717B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A set of panels including a first panel with a first main plane and a second panel with a second main plane is described. The first panel and the second panel are provided with a mechanical locking device for locking of a first edge of the first panel to a second edge of the second panel at a junction plane, wherein the first main plane is essentially perpendicular to the second main plane and the junction plane is extending at an angle to the first main plane and the second main plane between the first main plane and the second main plane.