Athletic Training System With Angled Rebound Panel

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current athletic training systems lack the ability to effectively simulate the dynamic angles and velocities of a ball in real-world scenarios, limiting the training effectiveness for athletes in passing and receiving skills.

Innovation Solution

An athletic training system featuring a ball redirection portion with angled surfaces and a rebounding panel portion, allowing for adjustable angles and velocities to randomly redirect incoming balls, incorporating multi-piece construction and coupling mechanisms for stability and adjustability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed-angle rebounding device is used, then the device structure is simple, but it cannot simulate dynamic angles and velocities of balls in real-world scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to simulate dynamic angles and velocitiesVSAvoiddevice structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rebounding panel is designed to be movable rather than fixed, allowing it to dynamically adjust its angle in response to incoming balls. This enables the device to simulate varying angles and velocities encountered in real-world athletic scenarios, transforming a static structure into an adaptive training tool that replicates game conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device is divided into separate functional components including a rebounding panel, support structure, and mounting mechanism. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently - the panel for dynamic movement, the support for stability, and the mounting for adjustability - thereby achieving complex functionality through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If a single-piece construction is used, then the manufacturing process is simple, but the device lacks adjustability and stability

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadjustabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The device is constructed from multiple separate pieces including the rebounding panel, support frame, and mounting components. This multi-piece construction enables independent adjustment of each component's position and angle, providing the necessary adaptability while allowing each individual piece to be manufactured using standard processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The mounting mechanism and support structure are designed to accommodate various configurations and angles, making the device universally adjustable for different training needs. This multi-functional design allows the same basic structure to serve multiple training purposes without requiring custom manufacturing for each configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If adjustable components are added to simulate varying angles, then training realism is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining effectivenessVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Rather than using multiple fixed components at different angles, the invention employs a single dynamic rebounding panel that can move to various angles. This approach achieves training realism through controlled movement of one component rather than through the arrangement of multiple static components, thereby maintaining simplicity while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device achieves varying ball redirection angles by changing the position and orientation parameters of the rebounding panel rather than by adding multiple components. By adjusting parameters such as panel angle and position, the system simulates different game scenarios, improving training effectiveness without proportionally increasing device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances training realism by providing a dynamic and adjustable environment for athletes to practice ball handling skills at varying angles and velocities, improving technique and reaction time.

Implementation Method 1

a ball redirection portion including at least one angled surface... configured to rebound the ball at varying angles and velocities

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic collision: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentUS20240359077A1Athletic training system
Publication Date: 2024.10.31 DZEWALTOWSKI ALEX
  • US20240359077A1 patent drawing
  • US20240359077A1 patent drawing
  • US20240359077A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An athletic training system may include, but is not limited to: a ball redirection portion including at least one angled surface; and a rebounding panel portion including a substantially planar structure. The at least one angled surface may be an arcuate surface and/or a planar surface angled relative to path of an incoming ball.