Angled Reinforcement Panel for Vehicle Impact Absorption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing security barriers are prone to rupturing under impact forces from moving vehicles and lack sufficient strength and rigidity to effectively absorb such impacts.

Innovation Solution

A security barrier design featuring a reinforcement panel connected at an angle to the front and bottom panels, with side panels also connected at an angle, providing additional strength and impact absorption capabilities, and allowing for compact configuration for transport and easy installation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a gabion-type security barrier with multiple panels is used, then the barrier provides basic structural strength and rigidity, but it is prone to rupturing at connection points under impact forces from moving vehicles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact absorption capabilityVSAvoidresistance to rupturing
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement panel is merged with the front panel through direct connection, creating a unified structural element that distributes impact forces across a larger area. This combination eliminates the weak connection points between separate panels by integrating the reinforcement function directly into the front panel structure, preventing rupture under vehicle impact forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement panel is pre-installed on the front panel before the barrier encounters impact forces. This preliminary reinforcement strengthens the structure in advance, ensuring that when impact forces are applied, the barrier is already prepared to absorb and distribute the forces without rupturing at connection points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Strength

If the reinforcement panel covers the entire front panel, then maximum strength and impact absorption is achieved, but material costs increase and installation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact absorption capabilityVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of uniformly reinforcing the entire front panel, the reinforcement panel is strategically positioned to cover only the lower portion where impact forces from vehicles are most likely to occur. This localized reinforcement approach provides sufficient strength where needed while reducing material usage and simplifying the installation process compared to full-panel coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP3310967B1Security barrier and method of installing a security barrier
Publication Date: 2019.08.14 GUARDIAR EURO
  • EP3310967B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3310967B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3310967B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

Security barrier (1) comprising a front panel (2) and a bottom panel (3), the security barrier (1) comprises a reinforcement panel (4), which in installed state of the security barrier (1), covers at least part of the front panel (2), in order to double the said at least part of the front panel (2) and method of installing such a security barrier (1).