Angled Outboard Slat Edge for Winglet Vortex Interference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge is to maintain performance control while increasing winglet size on fixed-wing aircraft, as larger winglets introduce pitching and lift control issues due to non-linearities in pitching moment and lift coefficient, caused by flow separation induced by leading edge slats, which existing solutions either complicate with fly-by-wire control laws or incur costly design changes.

Innovation Solution

The configuration of the outboard slat on the aircraft wing, with a specific geometry including a leading edge, trailing edge, inboard edge, and outboard edge, where the outboard edge has a first and second side portion projecting onto the slat plane at defined angles, effectively directs the slat vortex inboard, reducing interference with the winglet and maintaining linear lift and pitching moment coefficients with angle of attack.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If larger winglets are used to reduce drag, then fuel savings improve, but pitching and lift control problems worsen due to non-linearities caused by flow separation from leading edge slats

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel savingsVSAvoidpitching and lift control
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the geometric parameters of the outboard slat edge, specifically creating a multi-segmented configuration with defined angles (first angle between 0-45 degrees, second angle between 45-90 degrees) relative to the wing chord line. This parameter change alters the flow separation characteristics to maintain linear aerodynamic behavior with larger winglets

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies a specific geometric configuration only to the outboard portion of the slat (the tip region), while the inboard portion maintains conventional design. This localized modification targets the specific area where vortex interference with winglets occurs, allowing larger winglets without affecting overall control performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of energy

If larger winglets are installed to improve drag reduction, then fuel efficiency increases, but device complexity increases due to need for fly-by-wire control laws

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the source of the control problem by modifying the slat geometry to prevent vortex-induced non-linearities. This removes the need for complex fly-by-wire control laws, allowing larger winglets to be used with simpler conventional control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Loss of energy

If winglet size is increased to reduce drag, then fuel savings improve, but the solution becomes costly once aircraft wing design is frozen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel savingsVSAvoidcost effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention modifies only the outboard edge geometry of the slat, which can be implemented as a standalone component change without requiring complete wing redesign. This localized modification is cost-effective even after initial wing design is frozen, as it involves minimal structural changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration allows for larger winglet sizes without performance issues, providing gradual airflow interference, maintaining lift and reducing undesirable pitch-up, while simplifying operational control and reducing weight, complexity, and maintenance compared to other solutions.

Implementation Method 1

the second side line extending toward the inboard edge as it extends toward the trailing edge... effectively directs the slat vortex inboard, reducing interference with the winglet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVortex: Vortex Ring

Implementation Method 2

caused in part by flow separation induced by interference of vortices created by the leading edge slats

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow separation: Flow Separation

Data Source

PatentUS11299255B2Aircraft slat including angled outboard edge
Publication Date: 2022.04.12 BOMBARDIER INC
  • US11299255B2 patent drawing
  • US11299255B2 patent drawing
  • US11299255B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A slat (50) for an aircraft wing comprises a leading edge (51) defining a leading edge line (61), a trailing edge (52) defining a trailing edge line (62), the leading and trailing edges line defining a slat plane, the chord distance (69) extending normal to the leading edge and measured along the slat plane; an inboard edge extending between the leading and trailing edges; and an outboard edge (56) extending between the leading and trailing edges. The outboard edge comprises a first side portion having a projection on the plane defining a first side line (63), and a second side portion having a projection on the plane defining a second side line (64), the second side line being disposed at a first angle to the first side line and at a second angle to the leading edge line as it extends toward the inboard and trailing edges. A wing assembly and an aircraft including the slat are also disclosed.