Power Tool Kickback Control With Angular Velocity Shutdown

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Power tools experience kickback due to binding in workpieces, leading to loss of user control and potential injury, as existing technologies lack effective mechanisms to prevent or mitigate this issue.

Innovation Solution

A power tool equipped with a brushless DC motor, a switching network, a movement sensor, and an electronic processor that monitors angular velocity and power tool characteristics to implement kickback control by ceasing motor drive when predetermined thresholds are exceeded, adjusting operating parameters, and reversing motor direction to manage binding situations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a power tool is equipped with kickback control mechanisms including movement sensors and electronic processors, then user safety and control are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser safetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by using movement sensors to detect tool motion and electronic processors to analyze sensor data, comparing measured values against threshold values to determine when kickback is occurring and automatically adjusting motor drive accordingly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical kickback prevention mechanisms with an electronic control system that uses sensors, processors, and software algorithms to detect and respond to kickback conditions, thereby reducing mechanical complexity while improving safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If the electronic processor continuously monitors angular velocity and power tool characteristics to detect kickback, then kickback detection precision is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekickback detection precisionVSAvoiduse of energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial monitoring by continuously tracking certain parameters like angular velocity while periodically or event-drivenly monitoring other power tool characteristics, rather than continuously monitoring all parameters at maximum precision, thus reducing energy consumption while maintaining adequate detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If the switching network ceases motor drive immediately when kickback threshold is exceeded, then user control is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser controlVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by detecting early signs of kickback through sensor monitoring and threshold comparison, then proactively adjusting motor drive to prevent full kickback events from occurring, rather than waiting for kickback to fully develop and then reacting

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic control by continuously adjusting motor drive based on real-time sensor feedback and changing operating conditions, allowing the system to optimize between productivity and safety depending on the current state rather than using fixed on/off control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces kickback occurrences, enhancing user control and safety by dynamically responding to binding conditions and adjusting power delivery, thereby preventing unintended tool movement.

Implementation Method 1

a brushless direct current (DC) motor within the motor housing portion and having a rotor and a stator. The rotor is configured to rotationally drive a motor shaft about a rotational axis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a movement sensor configured to measure an angular velocity of the housing of the power tool about the rotational axis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertial measurement: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS12179331B2Kickback control methods for power tools
Publication Date: 2024.12.31 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORP
  • US12179331B2 patent drawing
  • US12179331B2 patent drawing
  • US12179331B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Kickback control methods for power tools. One power tool includes a movement sensor configured to measure an angular velocity of the housing of the power tool about the rotational axis. The power tool includes an electronic processor coupled to the switching network and the movement sensor and configured to implement kickback control of the power tool. To implement the kickback control, the electronic processor is configured to control the switching network to drive the brushless DC motor, receive measurements of the angular velocity of the housing of the power tool from the movement sensor, determine that a plurality of the measurements of the angular velocity of the housing of the power tool exceed a rotation speed threshold, and control the switching network to cease driving of the brushless DC motor in response to determining that the plurality of the measurements of the angular velocity exceed the rotation speed threshold.