Halogenated Alkene Production via Anhydrous Dehydrohalogenation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current dehydrochlorination processes for producing halogenated alkenes are inefficient, require additional separation steps, and generate significant waste, with high costs due to the use of phase transfer catalysts and reduced yield, while existing methods using Lewis acids result in low conversion and selectivity.

Innovation Solution

A process involving an anhydrous liquid phase reaction with a homogeneous metal salt catalyst, such as iron chloride, at elevated temperatures, which separates halogenated alkenes from light and heavy by-products, allowing for recycling of unreacted materials and reducing waste, thereby improving yield and selectivity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If an aqueous base is used in dehydrochlorination process, then the process is efficient, but a co-solvent is required which increases process complexity and cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedehydrochlorination efficiencyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and removes the water component from the reaction system by using anhydrous conditions and molecular sieves to trap any water produced. This eliminates the need for co-solvents and aqueous bases, simplifying the process while maintaining high dehydrochlorination efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the fundamental parameter of water content in the reaction system from aqueous conditions to anhydrous conditions. By using dry base (e.g., dry NaOH or KOH) and anhydrous solvents, the process avoids the need for co-solvents while maintaining reaction efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If no co-solvent is used to avoid additional separation steps, then process complexity is reduced, but dehydrochlorination efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoiddehydrochlorination efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention employs molecular sieves that automatically trap water produced during dehydrochlorination, maintaining anhydrous conditions without requiring external intervention or complex separation systems. The base material itself is designed to work effectively in anhydrous conditions, making the process self-sufficient and highly efficient without co-solvents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Speed

If phase transfer catalyst is added to enhance kinetics, then reaction rate improves, but manufacturing cost increases due to catalyst cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction kineticsVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces expensive phase transfer catalysts with a small amount of inexpensive FeCl3 catalyst that works effectively in anhydrous conditions. The catalyst is used in minimal quantities (0.01-5 wt%) and can be easily removed, significantly reducing manufacturing costs while maintaining fast reaction kinetics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Stability of the object's composition

If phase transfer catalyst is used to provide miscibility, then phase mixing improves, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase miscibilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the fundamental parameter from aqueous to anhydrous conditions, which fundamentally alters the miscibility behavior. In anhydrous conditions, the organic substrate and base can interact directly without requiring phase transfer catalysts, eliminating the need for expensive additives while maintaining good mixing and reaction efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

5Quantity of substance

If Lewis acid catalyst is used for dehydrochlorination, then conversion can be achieved, but selectivity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveconversionVSAvoidselectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the catalyst type from Lewis acid to a different catalytic system (FeCl3 in anhydrous conditions with molecular sieves) that provides both high conversion and high selectivity. The anhydrous environment and water-trapping mechanism prevent side reactions that reduce selectivity, while the catalytic system maintains high conversion rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process enhances the yield, selectivity, and reduces waste and manufacturing costs by using a minimal amount of catalyst, enabling efficient separation and recycling of materials, and captures valuable by-products like anhydrous HCl.

Implementation Method 1

heating the reaction mixture to form the halogenated alkene, light by-products, and heavy by-products

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

heating the reaction mixture to form the halogenated alkene

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS11358918B2Method for the production of a halogenated alkene by catalyzed dehydrohalogenation of a halogenated alkane
Publication Date: 2022.06.14 BLUE CUBE IP LLC
  • US11358918B2 patent drawing
  • US11358918B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides methods for the preparation of halogenated alkenes from halogenated alkanes using a homogeneous catalyst.