Animal Control Pole Dual Release Mechanism
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Traditional animal control poles lack efficient release mechanisms and require costly, time-consuming cable replacement, often using harsher cables that can injure animals during handling.
Innovation Solution
The animal control pole features dual release mechanisms and a two-part cable design, allowing users to select release methods and replace only damaged cable portions, using a larger diameter cable for gentler handling.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of operation
If traditional single release mechanism is used, then device complexity is reduced, but ease of operation deteriorates due to limited release options
Solution Approach 1:
The release mechanism is divided into two distinct segments: a first release mechanism at the distal end for releasing the cable from the retaining element, and a second release mechanism at the proximal end for feeding additional cable length. This segmentation allows each mechanism to perform a specific release function, improving operational versatility without requiring a completely complex integrated system.
Solution Approach 2:
The pole is designed with dual release mechanisms that provide multiple release options for different operational scenarios. The first mechanism handles cable release from the retaining element, while the second mechanism handles cable length adjustment, creating a universal system that can address various animal control situations with a single device.
2Reliability
If full cable replacement is required, then reliability is improved, but loss of time and productivity worsen due to time-consuming replacement process
Solution Approach 1:
The cable system is segmented into replaceable portions that can be independently serviced. The cable connects to the retaining element through a standardized interface that allows partial replacement without affecting the entire cable assembly, enabling quick repairs while maintaining system reliability.
Solution Approach 2:
The design allows for selective replacement of only the damaged cable portions while retaining functional components. The standardized connections enable discarding of worn cable sections and recovering of still-serviceable components, reducing overall replacement time and material waste.
3Object-affected harmful factors
If smaller diameter cable is used, then device complexity is reduced, but object-affected harmful factors increase due to potential animal injury
Solution Approach 1:
The cable diameter parameter is optimized to balance animal safety with structural requirements. A larger diameter cable reduces the risk of animal injury by distributing force more evenly, while the accompanying structural adaptations in the retaining element and release mechanisms ensure the increased cable size does not compromise device functionality.
4Adaptability or versatility
If cable length is fixed, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability worsens due to inability to adjust loop size
Solution Approach 1:
The cable system incorporates dynamic length adjustment capability through the second release mechanism. Users can feed additional cable length through the axial bore as needed, transforming a static cable system into a dynamic one that adapts to various animal sizes and control scenarios without requiring multiple fixed-length cables.
Solution Approach 2:
The second release mechanism is pre-configured with additional cable length stored within the pole structure. This preliminary preparation allows rapid deployment of extended cable length when needed, eliminating the need for separate cable attachment operations and maintaining operational efficiency.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
Enables safe and efficient animal handling with customizable release options and cost-effective cable replacement, reducing the risk of injury to both animals and handlers.
Implementation Method 1
A second release mechanism includes a spring loaded cable feed that, when actuated, forces an additional length of cable through the axial bore of the second end and thereby increases the size of the loop
Data Source
AI summary
An animal control pole has a first end adapted to be held by a user, and a second end adapted to ensnare and assist in the control of an animal. The pole has an axial bore extending therethrough and a cable that extends through the axial bore and extends from each end of the pole. A retaining element is located at the second end of the pole and retains the free end of the cable that extends from the second end, so as to form a closed animal engageable adjustable loop. The animal control pole includes dual release mechanisms. A first release mechanism releases the free end of the cable that extends through the second end of the pole. A second release mechanism forces an additional length of cable through the axial bore of the second end and thereby increases the size of the loop.